![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The avg 2p2er generates far more $$ in rake than the avg fish. Why would party not see this and protect against us going elsewhere? [/ QUOTE ] |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
The avg 2p2er generates far more $$ in rake than the avg fish. Why would party not see this and protect against us going elsewhere? [/ QUOTE ] What happens if the fish sit and pass $$ around? It all goes to the house. With winning players, this is not the case. Its pretty simple actually. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Hi Daliman, I don't think winning players are necessary if the pool of fish is large enough. Winning players are only necessary if there is a need to get tables started. Whether or not 8-tabling TAGs increase or decrease longterm profits is up for debate. Anyways, all I'm saying is that Party shouldn't care if any of us can make a living, they should care how much money they make, and I don't think this decision hurts them in regards to the bottom line. -Michael [/ QUOTE ] Well, I accrue over 10k a month in rake, and I personally know at LEAST 20 other WINNING players who do the same. GL finding more than 5 losing players that generate this much EVERY month. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the question is also, how much did you win and take off the fish? And if you had not won that money from the fish, would they have continue playing? If so you are costing party.
I think you guys are looking at this as if fish think the same way we do and play X hrs/week. It is most likely that they deposit $Y and play until they are broke. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you played skins with rakeback, party wasn't getting that entire 10k. Some of it went to you, some to your affiliate and some to the skin. I don't know what deals the skins had, but it's possible only 5k went to party(?).
If you now decide to boycot party, that's obviously going to be bad for them, but if you start playing only on party and not getting rakeback, that's very much better for them. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Well, I accrue over 10k a month in rake, and I personally know at LEAST 20 other WINNING players who do the same. GL finding more than 5 losing players that generate this much EVERY month. [/ QUOTE ] You pointed exactly to the problem but you are using upside-down logic. For every winning player they HAVE TO FIND a LOT of losers to fill up the tables so that the winners continue to win. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know how I missed this after reading this party news for like 2 hours on 2+2, but... OMFGBBQ!!! THIS IS SO AWSOME!!!! HELLLSS YEAH!! I'm an empire affiliate, but I don't get rakeback for myself, so the only reason I used skins was to 8 table.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
maeke jawhonz
maeke jawhonz maeke jawhonz maeke jawhonz |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
No [censored]? I thought you were going to go solo and only allow 4 tables.........
Give us some info that isn't beyond obvious. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mike
Gonna be easy to find someone for that job now.. |
![]() |
|
|