|
|
#61
08-24-2005, 04:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If Technical Analysis works, why isn\'t there a mutual fund for it?
No, I mean post them as you buy them or short them, not after you've been successful.
Hey, look how successful fundamental analysis can be: in MSFT Mar 20th, 1986 @ 0.08 out Dec 27th, 1999 @ 52.33 +$31,415,926 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] 
|
|
#62
08-24-2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Technical Analysis works, why isn\'t there a mutual fund for it?
If I did that there would be 50 posts a day on this thread, not gonna miss a potential op cause i was posting on a msg board lol, and if i was gonna make stuff wouldn't it be much cooler if i just said "out CLST +1.40 on Large shares on multiday" lol
|
|
#63
08-24-2005, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Technical Analysis works, why isn\'t there a mutual fund for it?
This thread has been discussed to death.
I trade with hundreds of traders every day successfully trading using TA as one of our tools. The proof is in the profits, and thats proof enough for me!
|
|
#65
08-25-2005, 01:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Technical Analysis works, why isn\'t there a mutual fund for it?
cy coiling at resis
|
|
#66
08-26-2005, 01:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Technical Analysis works, why isn\'t there a mutual fund for it?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
