|
|
#51
12-10-2005, 01:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I like a 10 as much as anyone, but that doesn't mean I actually think an 8 or a 7 doesn't meet my standards. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think a 5 or 6 doesn't meet your standards either. [/ QUOTE ] Unless I'm misunderstanding you, that's a real weird thing to say and doesn't make sense. I don't know what you think a 5 or 6 is, but I know what I think a 5 or 6 is. I also know my standards, and I have no idea how you could possibly think you know them better than me. Who is attracted to what he considers unattractive? By definition ... [/ QUOTE ] I said I "think", not I "know". We are still allowed to think here, right? If you've never hooked up with what you would call a 5, then you either scale women differently than me or have a much better track record. If it's the latter, congrats--if it's the former, no biggie. 
|
|
#53
12-10-2005, 01:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
one-sided AIM convo with the little one...
me: sure OOT has ridiculously high standards me: but the women that we are usually rating are ridiculously gorgeous me: so there is a scale of 1-10 of how they fair within the realm of ridiculously gorgeous me: which is how most women get rated in OOT me: unless it's renee zellweger
|
|
#55
12-10-2005, 01:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] if we can makes rules about not saying the word "poker" I don't see why we can't do this. [/ QUOTE ] That's not at all the same as requiring someone to post RL pictures just to keep his status on 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] A mod suspended Diablo for saying that two people were dating. I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax.
|
|
#57
12-10-2005, 01:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
I don't see why we can't do the same for someone posted absurd statements about hot chicks. The pic is just a way to avoid the suspension. Relax. [/ QUOTE ] That's fine. I'm just telling you that it will probably never happen.
|
|
#60
12-10-2005, 01:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s rationalize our absurd standards for girls
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think a good addition to the picture requirement is that you must be in the picture yourself. If you are not in the OOT photo directory you must also provide a picture of you in front of 2+2 signed in on your name. You can never be too careful. [/ QUOTE ] also, anyone who disagrees with any law of these United States must submit a picture of themselves with their juris doctorate degree and bar card. we don't want any of the proletariat voicing their opinions now do we. always careful, Jeff [/ QUOTE ] Can someone else start a thread about people using bad analogies that don't make sense? Seriously, Jeff, this sort of rule is NOT without precedant on 2+2. The Diablo suspension from just two days ago is a perfect example. Contrary to what you may think, 2+2 is not a nation that prides itself on freedom, it's a god damned website.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
