|
|
#51
10-31-2005, 07:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe this is a belated joke [/ QUOTE ] I promise this is no joke. 
|
|
#53
10-31-2005, 08:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] so you're up overall? you're up 500+ bets? umm.. [/ QUOTE ] Yes. So you could say this really is all pretty stupid. It's just kinda crazy how much I'm down on one site. People talk about such huge swings beeing next to impossible...well...I pretty much proved they're not eh? but still I've lost the last 7 of 8 days overall. Blegh. Getting a little annoying. [/ QUOTE ] Kind of sounds like doubts are creeping in (not in your game but of the site). And I can't see this big a swing being play related. After so many hands played and practiced, your skill level, PT notes + HUD, a lot of your play is second nature with that VPIP. You're either running into big hands or getting drawn out (both or had 1 huge tilt induced session, done that when I was drunk and didn't remember). That's an insane number, to me it's almost unbelievable for a player of your caliber. It's Oct 31st not April 1st. Maybe this is a belated joke [/ QUOTE ] It's just a big statistical anomoly that shows that even a great player can have a downswing in the 600 big bet range.
|
|
#54
10-31-2005, 08:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
Since september first i'm down the following amount of bets at party poker. Not including skins. I'm doing well enough on other sites (up over 1100 bets...) but this run at party is just sickening. -107 at 100/200 -110 at 50/100 -94 at 30/60 -95 at 20/40 -95 at 10/20 I know this equals 500 but from peak til bottom it's 581. Yikes. I rule at poker.  [/ QUOTE ] You again? I told you not to call me unless it's an emergency.
|
|
#55
10-31-2005, 08:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] my bankroll is super inflated for the limits I'm currently [/ QUOTE ] pull a mike l, buy a house. [/ QUOTE ] And some mutual funds, and anything else that you can. Passive income is goot. Then again, you know this already.
|
|
#56
10-31-2005, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
It's just a big statistical anomoly that shows that even a great player can have a downswing in the 600 big bet range. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think it shows that at all.
|
|
#57
10-31-2005, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's just a big statistical anomoly that shows that even a great player can have a downswing in the 600 big bet range. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think it shows that at all. [/ QUOTE ] What does it show?
|
|
#58
10-31-2005, 09:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] It's just a big statistical anomoly that shows that even a great player can have a downswing in the 600 big bet range. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think it shows that at all. [/ QUOTE ] Trust me, it does if we assume that BK was playing well and that he was a winner in the games.
|
|
#59
10-31-2005, 09:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
Good heavens, man...I want to cry for you. I just called my girlfriend in here to show her this so that she'd understand what I mean by "swingy".
Yo, you wanna kick my ass heads-up or something - might get you back going. Seriously. OTOH, think of how good the upswing is gonna feel.... [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Best of luck, dude.
|
|
#60
10-31-2005, 09:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: minus 581 bets.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Unfortunately I still have you beat.  [/ QUOTE ] WTF?? Is this graph forged?? If it's not...I'm so, so, so sorry Mr. NLSoldier. [/ QUOTE ] Not forged [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
