|
|
#51
08-21-2005, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Who\'s hotter?
you basically have to be like 30+ to see AND remember fast times at ridgemont high. so don't be surprised if some people have not seen this movie! =P
|
|
#52
08-21-2005, 05:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who\'s hotter?
[ QUOTE ]
you basically have to be like 13 + to have seen AND remember fast times at ridgemont high. so don't be surprised if some people have not seen this movie! =P [/ QUOTE ] FYP.
|
|
#53
08-21-2005, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who\'s hotter?
[ QUOTE ]
I went with Cates. [/ QUOTE ] Denise Richards has a bad boob job man she is very sexy but that bad boob job really turns me off. BUT she has an amazing mouth and DSL and is slutty ie fun looking. She is a little fake looking also but that mouth of hers is outta control.. Just because I'm an old focker I choose Phoebe as number one ...she is etched in the minds of all adolecesnt boys of the late seventies/early 80's..she has the best pooper of all these girls easily in her prime..amazing pooper and real tits...better than any of these other chicks.. But on looking at the pics again I'm thinking Phoebe isnt as hot as I remember..hah..that first head shot of her is oh so yummy...she is a hopa delight. Kristin can be hot but she's not aging well-she's in last place. She's the kind of a girl you'd like to bang for a week or 2 if you lived on the upper east side in nyc..and then bail on her quickly..too damn expensive to maintain and not that hot. Katie Homes eyes and lips make her an easy number 2 ..if I was younger she'd get my vote. She has a natural beauty unlike Denise. Plus I way prefer brunettes to blonds.
|
|
#55
08-21-2005, 06:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who\'s hotter?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] you basically have to be like 13 + to have seen AND remember fast times at ridgemont high. so don't be surprised if some people have not seen this movie! =P [/ QUOTE ] FYP. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, Fast Times at Ridgemont High was made in 1982 link Seeing as how this was made 23 years ago, it would be a safe assumption that a large % of posters here have not seen this movie.
|
|
#56
08-21-2005, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who\'s hotter?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you basically have to be like 13 + to have seen AND remember fast times at ridgemont high. so don't be surprised if some people have not seen this movie! =P [/ QUOTE ] FYP. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, Fast Times at Ridgemont High was made in 1982 link Seeing as how this was made 23 years ago, it would be a safe assumption that a large % of posters here have not seen this movie. [/ QUOTE ] fast times is required viewing for almost anyone. I'm 25 and I sure as hell have seen it many times
|
|
#57
08-21-2005, 07:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Who\'s hotter?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] you basically have to be like 13 + to have seen AND remember fast times at ridgemont high. so don't be surprised if some people have not seen this movie! =P [/ QUOTE ] FYP. [/ QUOTE ] Dude, Fast Times at Ridgemont High was made in 1982 link Seeing as how this was made 23 years ago, it would be a safe assumption that a large % of posters here have not seen this movie. [/ QUOTE ] fast times is required viewing for almost anyone. I'm 25 and I sure as hell have seen it many times [/ QUOTE ] This is correct.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
