Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-15-2005, 10:51 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

[ QUOTE ]
I'm somewhat curious whether people on the left here are deliberately conflating Nuremberg-type crimes with what's going on in Iraq or are just ignorant of the truth.

[/ QUOTE ]

No one did that.

At least when I brought up Nuremberg, it was only to indicate that we ought to expect soldiers (that is, precedent exists which demonstrates we would punish if otherwise) to behave ethically. If they're ordered to behave unethically/immorally, I think they should be able to opt-out. Whether or not this contributes to/detracts from military efficacy is irrelevant.

I don't think anyone (at least in this thread) compared Nazi war crimes to current American military behavior in Iraq.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-15-2005, 10:55 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

[ QUOTE ]
This is not correct. The problem with WW2 was not the Nazis fighting a war against other nations. The problem was THE EXTERMINATION OF JEWS, GYPSIES, HOMOSEXUALS, etc. Those were the war crimes.

[/ QUOTE ]

What YOU just said it not correct.

Nazi leadership was tried, among other things, for initiating and waging wars of aggression:

"The International Military Tribunal was opened on October 18, 1945, in the Supreme Court Building in Berlin....The indictments were for:

1. Conspiracy to commit crimes against peace
2. Planning, initiating and waging wars of aggression
3. War crimes
4. Crimes against humanity"


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuremberg_Trials
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-15-2005, 10:58 AM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

[ QUOTE ]

No one did that.

At least when I brought up Nuremberg, it was only to indicate that we ought to expect soldiers (that is, precedent exists which demonstrates we would punish if otherwise) to behave ethically. If they're ordered to behave unethically/immorally, I think they should be able to opt-out. Whether or not this contributes to/detracts from military efficacy is irrelevant.

I don't think anyone (at least in this thread) compared Nazi war crimes to current American military behavior in Iraq.

[/ QUOTE ]

Suggesting that Nuremberg stands for the proposition that soldiers in Iraq should refuse to follow orders necessarily requires that: a) you misunderstand the rulings of the Nuremberg tribunal or b) you believe whatever crimes are taking place in Iraq are much worse than they truly are.

Bush and Blair could conceivably be tried for instigating a war of aggression. Ordinary soldiers could not.
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-15-2005, 11:01 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

[ QUOTE ]
Suggesting that Nuremberg stands for the proposition that soldiers in Iraq should refuse to follow orders necessarily requires that: a) you misunderstand the rulings of the Nuremberg tribunal or b) you believe whatever crimes are taking place in Iraq are much worse than they truly are.

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said, nor suggested, soldiers should refuse orders in Iraq.

In fact, I think I've been very careful to state that I don't believe, as Chris Alger might, that the American military is currently committing war crimes.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-15-2005, 11:03 AM
DVaut1 DVaut1 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ann Arbor, MI
Posts: 27
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

[ QUOTE ]
Bush and Blair could conceivably be tried for instigating a war of aggression. Ordinary soldiers could not.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very true.

Yet you would not hold soldiers personally accountable for war crimes they committed?

Not that this should to be said, but apparently its needed for some, I'm not talking about American soldiers here; just hypothetically.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-15-2005, 11:09 AM
bobman0330 bobman0330 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: How Can You Possibly Be Proud of Your Brother . . .

I'm not trying to pin anything specific on you, but it has certainly been suggested in this thread.

War crimes do not include aggressive war. Individuals are already subject to personal liability for war crimes under US law.
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-15-2005, 11:22 AM
superleeds superleeds is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 309
Default Re: My brother the Solider

I have read some of your other comments thru this thread and it seems to me that whatever the problems between you and your mother this is her way of saying to her son, 'Don't go and do something stupid that may result in you getting killed.'
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-15-2005, 12:46 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: My brother the Solider

Tell your brother that I thank him for his service.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-15-2005, 01:06 PM
ThaSaltCracka ThaSaltCracka is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 983
Default Re: My brother the Solider

My brother is in the exact same situation as yours. God speed to him, and hopefully he stays safe over there.
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-15-2005, 02:58 PM
MtSmalls MtSmalls is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: CO
Posts: 148
Default Re: My brother the Solider

"Hate the Sin, Love the Sinner"

I think that everyone here can agree that we respect the sacrifice that our soldiers are making, living and dying in service to their country. I hope that everyone here who has a family member or friend serving sees that person home safe, physically and mentally. I also hope that the current administration is thrown out on their ears starting in 2006, for putting them in that place.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.