|
|
#51
03-28-2005, 01:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
LMAO
Looks like I have to leave and never come back!
Player codewarrior Games played 3 Wins 0 (0%) Losses 3 (100%) Average Buy-In $5 Players with better winning percentage 179128 Players with worse winning percentage 0 $5 Table: 0 wins / 3 losses / 0% wins Player: For best results, a Player should have 20 or more games played to get an idea of their skill level. If so, here is how we suggest you analyze the data: Players Win Percentage 40% or higher Player is a Pro Players Win Percentage 35 to 40% Player is Very Good Players Win Percentage 30 to 35% Player is Slightly Above Average Players Win Percentage 25 to 30% Player is Slightly Below Average Players Win Percentage 20 to 25% Player is Below Average Players Win Percentage 10 to 20% Player is Way Below Average Players Win Percentage 0 to 10% Player is a Fish To qualify for a win, a Player must finish in the money, 1st, 2nd, or 3rd. Data retrieved in 0.46594786643982 seconds. 
|
|
#52
03-28-2005, 01:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
It seems that this forum is nothing more than a cyber country club for a tight-knit group of losing players with <10% of membership actually having anything worthwhile or substantial (read: correct) to say about how to actually beat SNG's. I propose that that <10% group get their own forum where poker knowledge, skills and experience will override familiarity, seniority and likability. I propose that the first and only requirement for membership be to run members party handle through Prophecy, other players PT statistics or another reliable source and comeup with a skill rating for this player that is based upon FACT and ACTUAL RESULTS other than this de-facto pecking order that has been established in this forum. A serious amount of improvement and poker education could be going on, but it is being lost on all this emotional static. WD [/ QUOTE ] *Yawn* Yugoslav
|
|
#53
03-28-2005, 01:24 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
Winning SNG Players? Isn't that what this forum is? This forum has help me plug many small leaks in my game. I tend to just read a lot of it and don't reply much.
PokerProphecy is not always accurate. Even if the ITM was accurate that doesn't mean skilled or not skilled. Think about this, who would have a higher ITM: player a - a decent player playing one table at the 10's player b - a great player playing 4 tables at a higher level(200's, 1000's) Stretching this a little further, which person's advice would you take? Ok, now say you were starting out and playing 10's, which person's advice would you take? You see how everything is dependent on a lot of things. Just because you see a lot of threads that aren't useful to you doesn't mean they aren't useful to anyone else. BTW my ITM was over 40 percent multi-tabling before I started posting or reading on here. However, I'd say this is one of the most useful places to enhance my game.
|
|
#54
03-28-2005, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
[ QUOTE ]
I WOULD HIGHLY RECCOMEND FORKING OVER THE $30 FOR PROPHECY... [/ QUOTE ] Is this, perhaps, the greatest veiled shill thread of all time?
|
|
#55
03-28-2005, 01:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
Anyone want to plug in Voltron87 through PP? I don't have it. You might be surprised at the results. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#56
03-28-2005, 02:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
not at all
i actually tried approaching the owner awhile back offering to sell it for him in a private label site but he declined. we're working on one of our own right now (my company). i have no financial stake in whether or not you buy it. but can you think of a greater tool for a multi-tabler? it may not be perfect but it's better than trying to decide based upon how many chips they have, what sex they are or what SN they chose... WD
|
|
#57
03-28-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
Player wuuwei
Games played 123 Wins 55 (44.72%) Losses 68 (55.28%) Average Buy-In $20 Players with better winning percentage 37866 Players with worse winning percentage 208383 $20 Table: 52 wins / 61 losses / 46.02% wins $30 Table: 3 wins / 2 losses / 60% wins $10 Table: 0 wins / 5 losses / 0% wins nice job, i'd reccomend moving up to the 33's...not much difference besides the 50% more money you win. WD
|
|
#59
03-28-2005, 02:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
....????
do tell WD
|
|
#60
03-28-2005, 02:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I PROPOSE A NEW FORUM: WINNING SNG PLAYERS
Player Voltron87
Games played 13 Wins 6 (46.15%) Losses 7 (53.85%) Average Buy-In $8.08 Players with better winning percentage 37866 Players with worse winning percentage 208383 $10 Table: 2 wins / 6 losses / 25% wins $5 Table: 4 wins / 1 losses / 80% wins
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
