Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:41 PM
SackUp SackUp is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

[ QUOTE ]
I'm surprised Howard the Duck hasn't made any of the "Worst" lists yet. It had a $37 million production budget, which was a lot in 1986. Clearly one of the worst movies of all time.

[/ QUOTE ]

I loved it when I was 6. have not seen it since and probably for good reason. Hard pressed to make my list with such fond childhood memories.

Alexander - I thought this blew too and could not have been cheap to make. I turned it off about half way through.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2005, 04:51 PM
HopeydaFish HopeydaFish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 151
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm surprised Howard the Duck hasn't made any of the "Worst" lists yet. It had a $37 million production budget, which was a lot in 1986. Clearly one of the worst movies of all time.

[/ QUOTE ]

I loved it when I was 6. have not seen it since and probably for good reason. Hard pressed to make my list with such fond childhood memories.



[/ QUOTE ]

I was a little older than you when it first came out (I would have been 12 at the time). Some of my friends saw it before I did, and they all thought it was great. However, when I finally got my parents to rent it for me, I spent most of the movie muttering "wtf" to myself as I realized that my friends were retards.

The movie wasn't originally meant solely as a kid's movie...however, small children are the only ones who were able to enjoy it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:38 PM
youtalkfunny youtalkfunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 261
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

I AM SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU!!!!

Just about every movie mentioned more than once in this thread has one thing in common: I DIDN'T WATCH IT! I COULD TELL IT SUCKED!

Life is too short to spend it watching bad movies.

I almost never walk out on a movie, because I'm mighty picky about which movies to go see. $9 isn't a huge investment, but two hours of my time is.

I'm going to re-read this thread, because it makes me feel smart.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:04 PM
drewjustdrew drewjustdrew is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 230
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

[ QUOTE ]
I AM SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
$9 isn't a huge investment, but two hours of my time is.


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to re-read this thread

[/ QUOTE ]

Aren't you a little too smart to take the time to reread this thread?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-05-2005, 11:12 PM
youtalkfunny youtalkfunny is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 261
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I AM SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
$9 isn't a huge investment, but two hours of my time is.


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to re-read this thread

[/ QUOTE ]

Aren't you a little too smart to take the time to reread this thread?

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, I never did go back and re-read it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I love playing the "I am smart" card, just to watch everybody around me go nuts, and look for ways to tear me down. Try it sometime. Start calling yourself "The Genius", and watch people go crazy.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-06-2005, 06:31 AM
daryn daryn is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 2,759
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I AM SMARTER THAN ALL OF YOU!!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
$9 isn't a huge investment, but two hours of my time is.


[/ QUOTE ]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm going to re-read this thread

[/ QUOTE ]

Aren't you a little too smart to take the time to reread this thread?

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, I never did go back and re-read it. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I love playing the "I am smart" card, just to watch everybody around me go nuts, and look for ways to tear me down. Try it sometime. Start calling yourself "The Genius", and watch people go crazy.

[/ QUOTE ]


i hear you brother!

also, like you i have not seen any of these "horrible" movies.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2005, 05:39 PM
LondonBroil LondonBroil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 576
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

Battlefield Earth.

This thread is done.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:34 PM
bad beetz bad beetz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: San Jose
Posts: 1,142
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

Battlefield Earth is #1 on my list. It think it is the worst big budget movie ever made.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:40 PM
Uethym Uethym is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

This thread begins and ends with...

Judge Dredd.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2005, 06:45 PM
rustyboy rustyboy is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Columbus OH
Posts: 21
Default Re: Nominations for WORST BIG BUDGET Moive of All-Time

I add Johny Mnemonic, the movie that made me doubt the Matrix.

But if Battlefield Earth isn't number 1, i dont know what is.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.