#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarification
I am referring to heads up SNS. In a heads up SNG, 66% in the money equals 20% ROI.
But my question is regards to using the martingale for SNGs. I wonder how big or small the fluctuations would be relative to Kelly and Half Kelly. Assume positive EV not negative EV (like roulette). |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarification
This would never work, because someone that has +ev at $109+ buyins is not going to want to play at the $5+1s to win some money playing a martingale system in SNGs.
Also, if someone wants to start at the 5s to win money using a martingale system, I'm willing to guess they don't have +ev at bigger buyin SNGs, or the bankroll for them. so basically the only ones this might work for wouldn't want to use it. >>>ZIP |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarification
What he's saying is that if you're a 66% ITMer at the $5s then there's a really good chance you're not a 66% ITMer at the 100s.
|
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarification
okay [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img]
|
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Clarification
[ QUOTE ]
This would never work, because someone that has +ev at $109+ buyins is not going to want to play at the $5+1s to win some money playing a martingale system in SNGs. [/ QUOTE ] What if he did anyway? What would be the consequences fluctuationwise and EV wise? |
|
|