#51
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
taking advantage of the rebump of this thread, I just want to confirm my idea that limping 22 UTG is at least EV neutral in a full ring game, but automuck in 6max? I ask here instead of HUSH because, well, this thread is here.
|
#52
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
So what about suited connectors like 56-9T?
|
#53
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
Is this why?
Party Poker 2/4 Hold'em (9 handed) converter Preflop:Hero is UTG with 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. <font color="#666666[/color">Hero calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#666666">3 folds</font>, Hero calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls. Flop: (11.50 SB) 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO raises</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero 3-bets</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, <font color="#CC3333">CO caps</font>, Hero calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls. Turn: (15.75 BB) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, MP3 calls, CO calls. River: (20.75 BB) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font> <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP1 folds, MP2 calls, MP3 folds, CO calls. Hero shows [ 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] ] three of a kind, twos. MP2 doesn't show [ 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ] high card queen. (Sweet play, brah.) CO doesn't show [ K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ] a pair of kings. Hero wins $92 from the main pot. Final Pot: 23.75 BB |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
[ QUOTE ]
Is this why? Hero wins $92 from the main pot. [/ QUOTE ] yes |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
Love the flop bet here
|
#56
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
[ QUOTE ]
So what about suited connectors like 56-9T? [/ QUOTE ] T9s is fine in a good game, probably down to 98s. 76s and the like are going in the muck until I'm in later position. Playing a small pocket pair is easy postflop. Playing suited conn's is a bit tougher without the godsend that is position. Rob |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
That was a rhetorical question.
|
#58
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?
[ QUOTE ]
taking advantage of the rebump of this thread, I just want to confirm my idea that limping 22 UTG is at least EV neutral in a full ring game, but automuck in 6max? I ask here instead of HUSH because, well, this thread is here. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, ask yourself if you'd open raise it in MP2 in a full ring game. if so, open raise it UTG in 6 max. if not, chuck it. that's a slight oversimplification, but it should serve as a good starting point. you can in fact call with small pairs and suited connectors like 98s UTG in a passive 6 max game, should you find one. but never open limping is a pretty decent strategy. 6max UTG, I usually raise 77+ and ditch the rest. I might raise 66 on my LAGgy days. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
Should I Cold Call 22 UTG?
What about cold calling 22 UTG?
I believe the correct answer is yes. |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should I Cold Call 22 UTG?
[ QUOTE ]
What about cold calling 22 UTG? I believe the correct answer is yes. [/ QUOTE ] you mean UTG+1? fold 22 to an UTG raise, unless the table is ridiculously loose. |
|
|