Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #51  
Old 08-05-2005, 03:58 PM
TheMetetron TheMetetron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
Default Re: Anyone over 6 figures actually filing as a Pro?

Well over 6 figures already, and yes I am going to get anally raped by the tax man. I wasn't going to hire a tax professional, but I'm thinking if he can save me a few thousand some how it will be more than worth it.
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:06 PM
fooz fooz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 13
Default Re: I\'m confused...

There's no question about paying taxes. I've already hired a CPA. And he's handling my estimated tax payments. But he agreed with me, that it doesn't make any sense to file as self-employed, as I'll have to take an additional tax hit.

Regarding the "unemployed" comment, I was half-joking, but somewhat serious. Is it not possible to be unemployed and lucky? I "hit it big" a few times at the poker tables and made $100K. I'll report taxes on all of it, BUT I'm still unemployed....don't have any job to speak of.
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:18 PM
fooz fooz is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 13
Default Re: Anyone over 6 figures actually filing as a Pro?

This doesn't sound right. Here's an extremely simplified example to demonstrate the point. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong or clarify this.

With no other job, I have winnings of $300K playing poker and losses of $100K, for a net of $200K.

The first $100K is taxed at 30%, and the second $100K is taxed at 40%.

Scenario A) I file as a pro:
- I only report my net income of $200K. I pay $70K in income tax (30% x 100 + 40% x 100).
- I also pay some additional percentage for medicare/social security that is less than 15%, given the cap people are mentioning.
- I write off expenses (below $10K for me).

Scenario B) I don't file as a pro:
- I report all $300K of winnings. THEN, I report my losses as itemized deductions. This reduces my taxable income back to $200K, CORRECT? So I'm stil only paying $70K in income tax.
- I don't have to pay med/SS tax.
- I don't write-off expenses (though my CPA says there are still a few I can write-off).


I realize writing-off expenses comes before you calculate your tax due...just adding those to be complete.


-fooz
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:53 PM
ActionBob ActionBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 84
Default Re: I\'m confused...

[ QUOTE ]
Regarding the "unemployed" comment, I was half-joking, but somewhat serious. Is it not possible to be unemployed and lucky? I "hit it big" a few times at the poker tables and made $100K. I'll report taxes on all of it, BUT I'm still unemployed....don't have any job to speak of.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is something I've looked a lot into and its hard to find anything definitive. There is a small bit in the R.B.S. Tax Guide for Gamblers about this. They mention a client who upon an audit was forced by the IRS to file as a professional. But they also mention there is nothing specific in IRS literature that says gambling for a living must be taxed as a business. It seems like another gray area and would likely be decided on a case by case basis if it ever came down to an audit.

-ActionBob
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:59 PM
scott8 scott8 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 194
Default Re: I\'m confused...

Thinking out loud here, but I wonder if a disadvantage to going the unemployed route would occur when you attempted to make large purchases like a house for instance.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 08-05-2005, 05:12 PM
ActionBob ActionBob is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 84
Default Re: I\'m confused...

[ QUOTE ]
Thinking out loud here, but I wonder if a disadvantage to going the unemployed route would occur when you attempted to make large purchases like a house for instance.

[/ QUOTE ]

It *probably* wouldn't make too much of a difference for most in this matter because if one plays poker for a living you'll end up likely having to get a no-doc mortgage anyway.

-ActionBob
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 08-05-2005, 05:38 PM
Gramps Gramps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Oaktown
Posts: 124
Default Re: Anyone over 6 figures actually filing as a Pro?

[ QUOTE ]
So filing as a pro you face an additional 15% self employment tax, but you get to write-off all business-related expenses.

But if you're making $100K+, that means you would have to have more than $15K in expenses for it to be worth it. Right? I don't see why anyone pulling significant dough would file as a pro.

[/ QUOTE ]

You can put 25% of your net income (in 2005 up to $42,000 ($168,000 net earnings)) pretax into an SEP IRA. If you take full advantage of this feature, it should more than make up for any disadvantages of filing as a non pro (the extra SS tax is deductible against your income tax, so it's less than 5% extra and only up to $80 something thousand).

But I imagine way too many pros fail to take advantage of this tax break.
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 08-05-2005, 07:04 PM
cgwahl cgwahl is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 51
Default Off topic

Kind of off topic I guess...but has there been any issues with filing online gambling winnings? I mean, isn't online gambling considered illegal in the US? Or is that based on what state you're in?

Wondering if anyone has ever been picked up because of this.
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 08-05-2005, 08:04 PM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 823
Default Re: Off topic

People don't get in trouble for listing the source of their income even if they are 100% and put down 'crack dealer'...
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 08-05-2005, 09:29 PM
broiler broiler is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 47
Default Re: Anyone over 6 figures actually filing as a Pro?

The 3 out of 5 rule would never be used against you if you are claiming income. This rule is only applied to people who report losses on a business activity. The IRS has no interest in allowing people to not claim income that they are attempting to claim.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:33 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.