Pharoah's club needs focus: to ten and others

[AZnuts]

Maybe I'm strange, but I very much dislike the giant inlays on Paulsons.

They just cover up the clay chip texture that I'm looking for, and give you a handful of inlay. If I wanted huge graphics, I'd get chipcos.

[Wooderson]

[ QUOTE ]
NIX THE MOLD CHANGE.

I confirmed with Trademark that they are keeping the SAME mold, but allowing the Grand inlay now, to fill the whole flat area.... (EVEN BETTER!)

Now we can really push for inlay shapes!

Ten


[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet. That is what I've been waiting to hear. Now let's PUSH for them.

[X-Files]

Grand inlay, shapes and what I am sure will be a great design, I am all in.

[ QUOTE ]
NIX THE MOLD CHANGE.

I confirmed with Trademark that they are keeping the SAME mold, but allowing the Grand inlay now, to fill the whole flat area.... (EVEN BETTER!)

Now we can really push for inlay shapes!

Ten

[/ QUOTE ]

[Mars357]

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'm strange, but I very much dislike the giant inlays on Paulsons.

They just cover up the clay chip texture that I'm looking for, and give you a handful of inlay. If I wanted huge graphics, I'd get chipcos.

[/ QUOTE ]

I very much agree with you! I have a friend who has a set of the old Paulson fan of cards chips. The graphic on those is so large that it covers half the TH&C on the outer edge... Why get a chip that has such a fnatastic mold, then slap a big sticker on it that hides a good part of what makes the chip so special....

[zackallen]

why am I not clever enough to figure this out! Anyone who is more clever than I can email me where to get an unauthorized perview?!

[TenPercenter]

[ QUOTE ]
why am I not clever enough to figure this out! Anyone who is more clever than I can email me where to get an unauthorized perview?!

[/ QUOTE ]

I took them down. They qare not accessible to anyone now.

We are reworking the mockups since the announcement of the grand inlays. We'll still mock them up on round inlays until I can confirm that we are allowed to use shaped inlays.

Ten

[zackallen]

ok, i feel a little less stupid.

For what it's worth, round inlay>*

[Lumpy]

[ QUOTE ]

round inlay>*

[/ QUOTE ]

There is an error in your formula
shaped inlay > round inlay

[jojobinks]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe I'm strange, but I very much dislike the giant inlays on Paulsons.

They just cover up the clay chip texture that I'm looking for, and give you a handful of inlay. If I wanted huge graphics, I'd get chipcos.

[/ QUOTE ]

I very much agree with you! I have a friend who has a set of the old Paulson fan of cards chips. The graphic on those is so large that it covers half the TH&C on the outer edge... Why get a chip that has such a fnatastic mold, then slap a big sticker on it that hides a good part of what makes the chip so special....

[/ QUOTE ]



we're not talking about giant inlays, though, right? is there any question that the grand inlays find a balance between chip and inlay?

[toots]

While I very much like the giant inlay (the fan of cards, for instance), Ten's design does indeed call for a much smaller inlay. It's just the nature of it: either a standard inlay, or a shaped grand inlay.