Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-18-2004, 04:06 AM
Drunk Bob Drunk Bob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 422
Default Re: Fabulous poker

dont forget about the HIGHEST RAKE ONLINE no body beats Party in this catagory for low limit ring games.
[img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-18-2004, 04:14 AM
Drunk Bob Drunk Bob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 422
Default Re: Fabulous poker

Just a question. If you finish 3rd will you pay off %10 2nd %35 or what?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-18-2004, 04:18 AM
Drunk Bob Drunk Bob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 422
Default Re: Fabulous poker

His software isn't worth DooDoo after this many years!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-18-2004, 04:30 AM
Drunk Bob Drunk Bob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 422
Default Re: Silybum is a liar -- stay away from pokerworld (was Re: Fabulous p

but party is not going to do this %o chance
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-18-2004, 08:18 PM
anaconda2002 anaconda2002 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: canada
Posts: 55
Default Re: Silybum is a liar -- stay away from pokerworld (was Re: Fabulous poker

You must be a Mensa Bunny--enjoyed reading
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-18-2004, 10:43 PM
kdog kdog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: worcester, MA
Posts: 437
Default Re: Fabulous poker

[ QUOTE ]
His software isn't worth DooDoo after this many years!

[/ QUOTE ]

It would need to be upgraded for sure but it was pretty damn good for the time. I'll bet the upgrading would be cheaper than developing new software for a start up.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-18-2004, 11:07 PM
kdog kdog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: worcester, MA
Posts: 437
Default Re: Silybum is a liar -- stay away from pokerworld (was Re: Fabulous poker

[ QUOTE ]
The issue isn't that some affiliates like jek don't offer their customers/signups a rake kickback. The issue is that most people don't realize they are actually signing up under an affiliate to begin with. They see a poker site banner with a software download and think they are signing up directly at the site. The affiliates don't explain that if they download the software from their site they get 25% of their rake for life. So for most people they don't even know there is an option to get a rake kickback through someone, an affiliate, who just tagged them for 25% of their rake for life.


[/ QUOTE ]

The issue is not that most people don't realize they are signing up through an affiliate, the issue is that the sites offer affiliate programs in the first place. That is what you(and I) disagree with and Grannie is right, the disagreement is with the sites, not the affiliates.

As far as someone signing up through an affiliate and not getting a deal...well...caveat emptor applies here just like it does in the car salesman analogy I used in the question I posed to you earlier. In both cases the buyer could do better by dickering but if they don't...

Since you are relatively new here I'll end this post with the last signature line I was using when they were still allowed.

"Nobody ever went broke underestimating the intelligence of the American public." P.T.Barnum
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.