Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:12 PM
mothman mothman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re:$200 NL

hahaha [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:13 PM
MJL MJL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: ed

was Ed seat 3?
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:13 PM
ianlippert ianlippert is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 88
Default Re:$200 NL

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
whats a running board?

[/ QUOTE ]
its on the side of a pickup truck under the door

[/ QUOTE ]

Har Har!

no respect for the noobs around here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:17 PM
mothman mothman is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 0
Default Re: ed

i think so
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:20 PM
MJL MJL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: ed

I think down 20K
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:20 PM
surfinillini surfinillini is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re:$200 NL

[ QUOTE ]
this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in...

This game is one where you need to double up to play "correctly".

[/ QUOTE ]

see what I mean


BTW - is Andrew wearing a fake beard? Anyone ever seen Witness.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:21 PM
MJL MJL is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 8
Default Re: ed

He was down about 40K and then doubled up
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:24 PM
spsurfin_Michael spsurfin_Michael is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 65
Default Re:$200 NL

Geoff,

You are correct--the same is true of the $100 game. The blind structure sucks in both these games. The $300-500 or $500game are the only ones to play where you can be a consistant winner.

[ QUOTE ]

is this the $200 NL game?

this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:24 PM
mostsmooth mostsmooth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: AC
Posts: 153
Default Re:$200 NL

thats my kind of dealer!
somebody tell her i said hi?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 11-17-2005, 11:27 PM
surfinillini surfinillini is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 5
Default Re:$200 NL

[ QUOTE ]
Geoff,

You are correct--the same is true of the $100 game. The blind structure sucks in both these games. The $300-500 or $500game are the only ones to play where you can be a consistant winner.

[ QUOTE ]

is this the $200 NL game?

this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

The $200 and lower fixed buy in games were created by the casinos for the recreational player. They kill on the rake and with all the constant rebuys, and unbelievably loose preflop play, the closest beatable NL game to this, agreed, is a 300/500 game, BUT YOU HAVE TO BUY FOR THE MAX.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.