#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
hahaha [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ed
was Ed seat 3?
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] whats a running board? [/ QUOTE ] its on the side of a pickup truck under the door [/ QUOTE ] Har Har! no respect for the noobs around here [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ed
i think so
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ed
I think down 20K
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in... This game is one where you need to double up to play "correctly". [/ QUOTE ] see what I mean BTW - is Andrew wearing a fake beard? Anyone ever seen Witness. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ed
He was down about 40K and then doubled up
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
Geoff,
You are correct--the same is true of the $100 game. The blind structure sucks in both these games. The $300-500 or $500game are the only ones to play where you can be a consistant winner. [ QUOTE ] is this the $200 NL game? this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in. [/ QUOTE ] |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
thats my kind of dealer!
somebody tell her i said hi? |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re:$200 NL
[ QUOTE ]
Geoff, You are correct--the same is true of the $100 game. The blind structure sucks in both these games. The $300-500 or $500game are the only ones to play where you can be a consistant winner. [ QUOTE ] is this the $200 NL game? this game is unbeatable in the longrun - not enough chips with this blind structure and such a low buy in. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] The $200 and lower fixed buy in games were created by the casinos for the recreational player. They kill on the rake and with all the constant rebuys, and unbelievably loose preflop play, the closest beatable NL game to this, agreed, is a 300/500 game, BUT YOU HAVE TO BUY FOR THE MAX. |
|
|