Your BB/100?

11.32 PTBB/100 @ $25NL but only 4K hands (full table)

Compared to my stupidly high 69.33 PTBB/100 on the 445 hands of $10NL games. I'm sure 445 hands is a large enough sample (joke!!!!)

[Bco1/75]

Why do you think this is? I have found the skill level to be only slightly better?

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


18PTBB/100 over 3K at 100PLO/8 (for xorbie)

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice.

[/ QUOTE ]

Running pretty hot still though, although yesterday was a serious grind. My first 1K I was at like 48PTBB/100 LOL.

[/ QUOTE ]

Heh. Over 1k at 200PLO8 I'm running at 47/100.

Doesn't compare to my 74/100 over 250 at 200PLO. AND I ONLY WON 39% OF SHOWDOWNS I MUST NOT BE GETTING LUCKY AT ALL OMG!!!1!!one

OK I understand that it is big bet per 100 hands, but in NL how do you determine what a big bet is? Is it the big blind? Sorry in advance.

[PokerFink]

For this semester...

17.5 ptbb/100 @ NL100 over 2,500 hands.
31.5 ptbb/100 @ NL25 over 38 hands, drunk off my ass.

a big bet is 2 times the big blind

Okay this post is for all the people out there who think 12PTBB/100 is the norm. Imagine what data you would get if you went to OOT and asked everyone to post their penis length

It's not the norm!! Just no one wants to post 3PTBB/100 hands for 40k hands, hence we get some Bayesian stuff happenening, or something, you know what I mean

I'm at 3.5 PTBB/100, 10k hands for 200NL 6-max, and I am secure with my winrate.

Another thing to note is how much variance there is. Even for 20k hands, the standard deviation for your winrate is gonna be around 3PTBB/100 hands, so don't be suprised if your first 20k hands is 5PTBB/100 off what it should be