|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: How do you rate this play? | |||
| Horrible, read HOH, rookie |
   
|
8 | 22.22% |
| Interesting, but I wouldn't try it myself |
  
|
9 | 25.00% |
| Decent, but it telegraphs AK |
  
|
6 | 16.67% |
| Good, but I've seen it |
  
|
11 | 30.56% |
| Out of the box thinking at it's best, NICE |
  
|
2 | 5.56% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#41
10-04-2005, 05:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POLL: are you a winner or a loser?
Thank God this was limited to 2005 - that allowed me to answer honestly [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
|
#42
10-04-2005, 06:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POLL: are you a winner or a loser?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] More than 3/4 players are losing. I think close to 3/4 2+2ers are losing. [/ QUOTE ] Define "losing" and define "2+2er" I think people that are regged on 2+2 maybe, but in terms of people making regular contributions to the strat forums, I'd be shocked if 75% were losing. Some may be winning at small limits, and would be losing higher. [/ QUOTE ] I think this bolded part is key. I win at small stakes, but I probably would not win at 5-10 6max or higher than that at this point.
|
|
#43
10-04-2005, 07:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: POLL: are you a winner or a loser?
there are also people on here that have probably built up small bankrolls and then blown them in one drunken high-stakes tilt fest. so they might consider themselves winners as they've consistently won for 3 mos, 6 mos, whatever, even tho technically they're not.
also, there are probably folks here that may win marginally at their best game, but are overall losers. seems like a lot of folks don't out and out lie about their results (although some do) they just rationalize how to put things in the best light. still, i wouldn't be surprised if over half the significant posters here are winners, although i doubt it's anywhere close to 90%.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
