|
|
#43
09-29-2005, 04:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
[ QUOTE ]
Its a small mistake that can easily turn into a big one [/ QUOTE ] This doesn't make sense. Krishan 
|
|
#44
09-29-2005, 05:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
[ QUOTE ]
Small blind and bb are very loose, button could call 2 cold w/hands like pp's and Axs if he belives both are coming along. If he's a 2+2er he knows the same info as you. [/ QUOTE ] Given how we're playing this hand, these aren't like bad things. KQs kinda wants more people in this pot if we're not going the 3-betting route.
|
|
#46
09-29-2005, 05:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think folding for 5% should be reserved for people you have an actual read on [/ QUOTE ] Can someone explain this statement to me? What does Sthief mean "for 5%"? [/ QUOTE ] The pot is 17 BB. If I win this hand 5.8% of the time then I break even.
|
|
#47
09-29-2005, 05:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
Letting a hand like K3o call 1 bet instead of making him call 2 bets isn't a huge mistake. If lop flop comes down K3x and you end up losing a huge pot b/c he out flopped you, its a big mistake. Thats all I was really trying to say
|
|
#48
09-29-2005, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
I guess you can play it either way but I prefer to play it HU b/c I'm in position and I can use my position better HU than in a multiway pot. I also hate to let good players into a pot when I can avoid it. If button is a terrible player postflop I don't mind playing it multiway as much
|
|
#50
09-29-2005, 05:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 3/6 6m KQs
Preflop can be argued for either/or imo. Given the table.
Postflop I think a river raise can be argued as well. Given his range and his postflop action there is a decent chance u are ahead here. If u raise river u are rarely getting 3bet imo.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
