Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:18 PM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Afterthoughts

Random thoughts:

1) The problem with raising the turn in most cases like this is that the SB will only bet the turn when he has us in bad shape. So he will fire at the flop with all kinds of hands, but when he is UI on the turn with AK and 3 people calling, he will check. If he bets again, he has a bigger overpair and we are just giving away money by raising.

2) However in this case, waiting for the turn might not be a bad idea. Let's say that the SB checks the turn (when it bricks). If we had to act right behind him, we would be in bad shape because everyone can take a look at the river for one bet. But with 2 people in the middle, we still might be able to get a raise in when the action goes check-bet-call-hero raises or check-check-bet-hero raises and thus put the screws to the SB and his overcards.

3) So in this case I really don't mind waiting until the turn. If we were to act directly behind him, we would need to raise the flop (for value) because we would only be raising him with 2 outs should he bet the turn with a bigger overpair. Interesting hand.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:22 PM
KaiShin KaiShin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: thanks for all the fish
Posts: 1,195
Default Re: Afterthoughts

You've made a lot of posts lately regarding relative postflop position. Its taking me a long time to digest all this but its great to introduce these advanced concepts to this forum, I think. Awesome stuff.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:24 PM
Zoelef Zoelef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PSP\'s Tower
Posts: 231
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

(curious) What happens if you're check-raised on the turn?

I would check through on the river, even if it's 'weak-tight'.

Edit: Wow, this hand is older than my poker experience and I didn't realize it. ...um, hot damn!
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:33 PM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

[ QUOTE ]
(curious) What happens if you're check-raised on the turn?

I would check through on the river, even if it's 'weak-tight'.

Edit: Wow, this hand is older than my poker experience and I didn't realize it. ...um, hot damn!

[/ QUOTE ]

fold to a check-raise.. I don't think Hero should have bet the turn though.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:07 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

Fold to the cap, or to the first raise?
I think I would 3 bet here with 99's, unless I have a read that he is tight.
So assuming you would also 3 bet with 99, do you fold for one more bet when he caps.
I agree I raise this flop, great flop for your hand.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:09 PM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

[ QUOTE ]
Fold to the cap, or to the first raise?
I think I would 3 bet here with 99's, unless I have a read that he is tight.
So assuming you would also 3 bet with 99, do you fold for one more bet when he caps.
I agree I raise this flop, great flop for your hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

if you 3-bet and he caps.. folding would be unbelievably terrible, even if he shows you AA... do you see why?
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:10 PM
HajiShirazu HajiShirazu is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Bloomington, IL
Posts: 414
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

I think preflop is fine. I would always 3-bet but calling isn't the biggest crime in the world here, you could just play for a set, but I do think trying to get the blinds out is a better choice in the long run.
What I don't understand here is why people are talking about raising postflop.
On the flop, raising is just horrible. It accomplishes nothing at all. First, a raise has no value, because probably 70-90% of the time you have 2 outs and no fold equity. People just don't cap with only AK in the passive 1/2 game. Second, even if there was a decent chance you were ahead, raising does little to nothing to protect your hand unless SB 3 bets, in which case you are beat anyway and just wasted money. But, you're getting odds to draw to the set so you do have to see the turn.
In the situation that the turn was a blank instead of an ace, I would fold if SB bet and was called by MP1, and probably fold in the other SB betting scenarios as well. I just don't think the effective odds on a calldown are good enough even though the pot is big. If SB checked and MP1/CO bet I would raise and if checked to me I would bet.
The ace is an interesting card. SB turns his JJ-KK over by checking, and then MP1 doesn't bet, so he has a pair also or perhaps a KQ type hand, or maybe AJ. I can actually see the point in betting here, I would bet, because the pot is big, a "thinking" but WT player would put you on the big ace and MAYBE make a big laydown.
On the river, just give up, somebody has an ace or a bigger pair that they have decided to call down with. That's just wasting a bet, you'll never get two folds there.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:22 PM
car ramrod car ramrod is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 17
Default Re: 99 3-bet PF

I agree, you then have odds to hit your set, right?
So I guess your argument was to fold to the first raise then. How close is it to a 3 bet, assuming unkown raiser?
I would think you would be 3 betting here pf, maybe I'm wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.