#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
400 - Falcons
300 - Saints 200 - Rams 100 - Vikings good luck everyone cheers beer |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
[ QUOTE ]
Yeah, week 1 was a loooooooooong time ago, haven't gone better then +$200 since. After the past few weeks, +$200 is looking really freaking good right now. [/ QUOTE ] You know you're running bad when you start thinking, as I did last week before the Indy/Vikes game "Even if I lose, I'm only down $200 this week- that's a good week finally!" |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
$400 Titans -3
$300 Saints +5 $200 Jaguars -3 $100 Redskins -3 |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
I HATE THIS FRIGGIN GAME.
My awful picks. $400 - Eagles $300 - Steelers $200 - Giants $100 - Packers |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
$400 Falcons -3.5
$300 Texans +9.5 $200 Bills +8.5 $100 Seahawks +1 <font color="red"> Falcons </font> Love the Falcons coming off a bye week, which followed a game where their offense clicked a bit. The whole Brian Griese-Michael Pittman honeymoon ends now. <font color="red"> Texans </font> Indy's defense is too bad to be 9.5 point favorites; they haven't beaten a quality opponent by that much all year. I think Indy wins this game, just not by 10 points. <font color="red"> Bills </font> With McGahee, 8.5 is too many points to give the Bills, even in Foxboro. Buffalo is hitting its stride. <font color="red"> Seahawks </font> Holmgren is dedicated to getting the ball to his star RB; Martz is not. That and the way Seattle has run the ball the last few weeks gives them the nod here, because the Rams run D is so bad. Furthermore, Seattle basically kicked St. Louis' collective ass for 50+ minutes in their first meeting, only to let it slip away down the stretch. Don't think they haven't forgotten. Other games considered: Titans -- I liked this game for a while...then I saw that Chris Brown is a little banged up, then I remembered the Bears winning on the road last week...then I remembered that Anthony Thomas is basically running for a starting job somewhere else...so I went elsewhere. Lions -- Thought that with Leftwich out (even though I've heard great things about Garrard, Detroit might be a good play...but even though I'm not a big Fred Taylor fan, I couldn't see their D stopping him. Plus, the Lions have the worst offense in the league, and Jax's D is solid. Saints -- No Holmes, and a possibly injured Blaylock really made me look at this one, but the Saints defense is so bad...I dunno. I see this one as one of those shootout type games with no FGs...meaning that if KC wins, they win by more than 5. And the Saints are so unpredictable. I think I might be extra-wary of NO because I've lost with them twice already this year. As usual...I'm not actually betting real money on any of these games, so keep that in mind. -McGee |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
400 steelers -4
300 ravens -1.5 200 seahawks +1 100 bengals +3 |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
This is my first time participating in this, so if I do it wrong sorry.
Falcons - 400 Giants - 300 Bengals - 200 Texans - 100 |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
Steelers
Eagles Rams Jaguars |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
Dallas 400
Cleveland 300 Arizona 200 Jets 100 Going against public opinion, -Ftball |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Week #10 official \"3+1\" thread
Newbie::
400 Carolina Panthers 300 Minnesota Vikings 200 Jacksonville Jaguars 100 Tennessee Titans |
|
|