#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
Why'd you only play 2 hands?
|
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
game I was waiting for started.
|
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
E & B say they will spread it anytime there is an interest, but there is never any interest. Its like the old statement, which came first - the chicken or the egg?
I am going to call E this week to say if the ever are 1 or 2 players short to start a limit game, I'll be there in 1 hour. Unfortunatly I doubt I will be getting many calls. SFer - interesting... I have never seen a passive game at WS, they are always hyper-aggressive and very juicy. Raisy McRaiser is a regular, if ya know what I mean. The biggest straddle & re-straddle fish at my last table was one of the managing dealers, it was hysterical - and profitable. So... while we are on the topic.... perhaps we 2+2'ers should semi-officialy agree to meet once a week for a 4/8 game at one of these fine rooms. If we get 6 of us to commit, we could remain at NYPC (since they have the most tables)... if not, we can meet up at any of the other rooms. I think I can talk Ed into letting Evan play at WS, so that could be another option as well. TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
E&B is now just E.
|
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
E is better than B, life is good!
TT [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Orchard Street Rumors
My main problem is that NYPC doesn't try to develop an interest in playing limit amongst their players. There are ways of doing this.
They are "willing" to spread it sure, but they don't really care if it doesn't go. And when it does go, they seem to find ways to shaft it. |
|
|