|
|
#41
11-14-2005, 10:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have trouble believing that people can't separate pedophilia from marijuana use in terms of severity and detriment to society. [/ QUOTE ] It's not pedophilia if she is 15 and has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Does it change your opinion if I'm 20? [/ QUOTE ] and look 12? 
|
|
#42
11-14-2005, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yes. One is fifteen. The other, seventeen. One is eligible under the Half Your Age Plus Seven rubric. The other is not. You see? [/ QUOTE ] Not his point, and you know it. Given a random group of 100 girls, half 15 and half 17, could you identify their ages with 100% accuracy? I'm guessing not -- I'm guessing even 80% accuracy might be hard. [/ QUOTE ] I don't see how this matters. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that if you look at a 15 year old and your first thought that is that you'd like to bang her it isn't a bad thing. If you honestly couldn't piece that one together on your own then I'd really appreciate it if you threw your computer out a window to prevent you from ever posting on this site again. Thanks.
|
|
#43
11-14-2005, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have trouble believing that people can't separate pedophilia from marijuana use in terms of severity and detriment to society. [/ QUOTE ] It's not pedophilia if she is 15 and has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Pedophilia is the act or fantasy (wanting) of having sexual relations with a child. A person is no longer a child if he or she has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] You're kind of coming at it from the wrong angle. Pedophilia, medically speaking, pertains only to, specifically, prepubescent persons. However, from your statements you seem to be implying that you believe that the term "pedophilia" in and of itself is something wrong, and that if the definition were in fact pertaining to anyone under 18 that you would perhaps then have a problem with desire for <18 year olds. GoT
|
|
#44
11-14-2005, 10:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Yes. One is fifteen. The other, seventeen. One is eligible under the Half Your Age Plus Seven rubric. The other is not. You see? [/ QUOTE ] Not his point, and you know it. Given a random group of 100 girls, half 15 and half 17, could you identify their ages with 100% accuracy? I'm guessing not -- I'm guessing even 80% accuracy might be hard. [/ QUOTE ] I don't see how this matters. [/ QUOTE ] The point is that if you look at a 15 year old and your first thought that is that you'd like to bang her it isn't a bad thing. [/ QUOTE ] This post was much more awesome before you fixed it. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#46
11-14-2005, 10:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
I didn't see the original thread, so I don't know what was said, I will, however give my opinion on some of the issues being discussed.
Pedophilia: -I think of pedophilia as a sexual attraction to young children, ie pre-pubescent. Talking about a fully matured 15 year old is maybe borderline, but when it's on a forum populated by a large number of people in their young 20's, I'd say it's appropriate enough, especially considering the general nature of the content on oot. Banning P.Dirty- -I think locking this thread and PMing him asking him not to start a new one would have been good enough. If he didn't listen after he was asked, then maybe a ban would be in order.
|
|
#47
11-14-2005, 10:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have trouble believing that people can't separate pedophilia from marijuana use in terms of severity and detriment to society. [/ QUOTE ] It's not pedophilia if she is 15 and has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Pedophilia is the act or fantasy (wanting) of having sexual relations with a child. A person is no longer a child if he or she has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] You're kind of coming at it from the wrong angle. Pedophilia, medically speaking, pertains only to, specifically, prepubescent persons. However, from your statements you seem to be implying that you believe that the term "pedophilia" in and of itself is something wrong, and that if the definition were in fact pertaining to anyone under 18 that you would perhaps then have a problem with desire for <18 year olds. GoT [/ QUOTE ] The poster I originally replied to used the word "pedophilia" in referring to the original comments about the 15 year old in question. I was simply pointing out that it cannot be pedophilia if she has gone through puberty. I'm not implying anything at all about whether pedophilia is wrong.
|
|
#48
11-14-2005, 10:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I have trouble believing that people can't separate pedophilia from marijuana use in terms of severity and detriment to society. [/ QUOTE ] It's not pedophilia if she is 15 and has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] Pedophilia is the act or fantasy (wanting) of having sexual relations with a child. A person is no longer a child if he or she has gone through puberty. [/ QUOTE ] You're kind of coming at it from the wrong angle. Pedophilia, medically speaking, pertains only to, specifically, prepubescent persons. However, from your statements you seem to be implying that you believe that the term "pedophilia" in and of itself is something wrong, and that if the definition were in fact pertaining to anyone under 18 that you would perhaps then have a problem with desire for <18 year olds. GoT [/ QUOTE ] The poster I originally replied to used the word "pedophilia" in referring to the original comments about the 15 year old in question. I was simply pointing out that it cannot be pedophilia if she has gone through puberty. I'm not implying anything at all about whether pedophilia is wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Gotcha. Your OP in Politics made me think otherwise, but I understand. GoT
|
|
#49
11-14-2005, 10:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
I said the "marketing tool" argument could never be logically consistant, but I still think it's valid. There's going to be some things that will make an owner go "hmm... no, this is our name on the line" and a thread about a 15 year old girl probably does that moreso than say, PJN's posts.
|
|
#50
11-14-2005, 10:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: OK WTF
start your own website and talk about whatever you want
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
