Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:18 PM
bobbyi bobbyi is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 14
Default Re: The floor\'s decision.....

[ QUOTE ]
post it on the Internet for expert analysis.

[/ QUOTE ]
This line made me laugh.

I definitely agree with the floor's ruling.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:42 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
As far as angle shooters thriving with NL bets being made in a continuous motion instead of a single motion, this is a management decision. Angle shooters can only thrive if you allow them to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Angle shooting isn't the only issue here. As a dealer I prefer not to have to be the one to make a decision about whether a player stopped or was still in motion. The single motion rule makes my job easier, and I really don't believe that there is any negative impact from the rule.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:47 PM
Photoc Photoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 283
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
He had jsut gotten back from a trip to Vegas. People asked him how it was if he played poker etc. He said he played poker for a little bit, but that he quit because they cheated him.

[/ QUOTE ]

This point IMO is irrelevant. After being a pit dealer for 8 years, I know for a fact that people think they are being cheated at casino. I get asked all the time how they rig the games to make you lose and so on. Yes I know, its from a lack of common sense or intelligence, but it's still very common. I know people who wouldn't even go to the casino I worked at because they think its nothing but cheating their guests, even though I work there and will explain otherwise.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:49 PM
Randy_Refeld Randy_Refeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Casino - Tunica
Posts: 53
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As far as angle shooters thriving with NL bets being made in a continuous motion instead of a single motion, this is a management decision. Angle shooters can only thrive if you allow them to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Angle shooting isn't the only issue here. As a dealer I prefer not to have to be the one to make a decision about whether a player stopped or was still in motion. The single motion rule makes my job easier, and I really don't believe that there is any negative impact from the rule.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a lot of chips to be bet sometimes in NL where it is very difficult to get them all out at once.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:56 PM
Photoc Photoc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sin City
Posts: 283
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
As far as angle shooters thriving with NL bets being made in a continuous motion instead of a single motion, this is a management decision. Angle shooters can only thrive if you allow them to play.

[/ QUOTE ]

Angle shooting isn't the only issue here. As a dealer I prefer not to have to be the one to make a decision about whether a player stopped or was still in motion. The single motion rule makes my job easier, and I really don't believe that there is any negative impact from the rule.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are a lot of chips to be bet sometimes in NL where it is very difficult to get them all out at once.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is why they should just say how much they are going to bet. None of this TV bs of the dramatization in betting helps quite a bit. Just say it, and the move it would clear up a lot of confusion as to when the player is finished with his betting.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 10-12-2005, 03:57 PM
Randy_Refeld Randy_Refeld is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Grand Casino - Tunica
Posts: 53
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
He had jsut gotten back from a trip to Vegas. People asked him how it was if he played poker etc. He said he played poker for a little bit, but that he quit because they cheated him.

[/ QUOTE ]

This point IMO is irrelevant. After being a pit dealer for 8 years, I know for a fact that people think they are being cheated at casino. I get asked all the time how they rig the games to make you lose and so on. Yes I know, its from a lack of common sense or intelligence, but it's still very common. I know people who wouldn't even go to the casino I worked at because they think its nothing but cheating their guests, even though I work there and will explain otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a different situation. This is a matter of havign a new palyer feelign cheated becasue he doesn't understand the rules. I have seen many players pick up and leave becasue they fealt cheated, that the rules we being applied unevenly between tehm and the locals. If you don't see why this is a problem jsut remeber that the poker boom won't last forever. It wasnt' that long ago that the poker staff had to give every guest in their room individual attention and make them feel welcome.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 10-12-2005, 04:06 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
I get asked all the time how they rig the games to make you lose and so on. . . . even though I work there and will explain otherwise.

[/ QUOTE ]


UMMM! Actually the pit games are all rigged against the players . . . That is the point isn't it. Its not cheating because your told the rules up front, but its still rigged.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 10-12-2005, 04:08 PM
jedi jedi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 517
Default Re: NLH Decision – “more angles than a protractor!”

I don't think this has been mentioned yet, but what if Player A held the nuts? Upon hearing player B say Call, Player A could have continued betting all-in by verbally declaring all-in? Player B's rationale would have then allowed him to fold because his "out of turn" call is not binding. This scenario clearly tells me that the floor's ruling was correct.

I don't think it's even close, but rules lawyers can certainly prove me wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 10-12-2005, 04:13 PM
DeuceKicker DeuceKicker is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 80
Default Re: NLH Decision – “more angles than a protractor!”

Randy's initial response hit the nail on the head.

The only thing I would add (in case you ever figure out the guys' email address) is that, IMO, he got off easy by ONLY being held to a call. When a slimeball tries an obvious and admitted angle shot like this, I'd like to see the floor give him a time out, or simply ask him to leave for the day. Repeat offenders should be blacklisted.
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 10-12-2005, 04:18 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: betting lines and procedures, rules

[ QUOTE ]
This is a different situation. This is a matter of havign a new palyer feelign cheated becasue he doesn't understand the rules. I have seen many players pick up and leave becasue they fealt cheated, that the rules we being applied unevenly between tehm and the locals.

[/ QUOTE ]

This of course is the arguement for having standardized rules (which you object to). The problem of course here is that your player felt cheated because he wasn't allowed to string bet. But if you allow him to string bet, the other player is going to feel cheated.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:19 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.