#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
[ QUOTE ]
By the way how come anyone ever strongly disagrees with my math, their reasoning is "Its too complicated and you obviously dont get it so I won't bother explaining it to you". There is no way in hell limping has a higher expectation than raising, under basically any circumstance in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] Because you always quote #'s as the gospel. Like I said, I ain't gonna waste my time teaching a 20% ROI guy poker. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
curtains, please note my preface. "I think this is a push PF almost always." If you think 100% PF push I'll go with that.
My other comment was concerning HU play in general. I think varying play HU, although dependent on the level of the blinds, the cards you get and your opponent, is an important part of being an effective HU player. This is my opinion. If you disagree, I'm willing to listen with an open mind. Honestly. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
I do vary my play, just not in a spot like this with smoething like Q9o. If you want to vary it with AJo thats fine, because you are at least inducing a push. In this spot you would have to fold if they make any reasonable raise |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] By the way how come anyone ever strongly disagrees with my math, their reasoning is "Its too complicated and you obviously dont get it so I won't bother explaining it to you". There is no way in hell limping has a higher expectation than raising, under basically any circumstance in this spot. [/ QUOTE ] Because you always quote #'s as the gospel. Like I said, I ain't gonna waste my time teaching a 20% ROI guy poker. [/ QUOTE ] More like 19% ROI after this set.. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Re: HU hand
That makes perfect sense.
|
|
|