|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: John Feeney\'s AQ test on Party
[ QUOTE ]
Most winning players in the party 15/30 have utg raising standards of something like AA-99, AKo-AJo, AKs-AJs, KQo, KQs. AQo does not have positive equity against these hands, althoug being in position does help. Still i would not call this an "easy 3 bet" : equity (%) win (%) / tie (%) Hand 1: 52.3790 % [ 00.46 00.07 ] { AA-99, AKs-AJs, KQs, AKo-AJo, KQo } Hand 2: 47.6210 % [ 00.41 00.07 ] { AQo } [/ QUOTE ] Ding, ding. We have a winner. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: John Feeney\'s AQ test on Party
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Most winning players in the party 15/30 have utg raising standards of something like AA-99, AKo-AJo, AKs-AJs, KQo, KQs. AQo does not have positive equity against these hands, althoug being in position does help. Still i would not call this an "easy 3 bet" : equity (%) win (%) / tie (%) Hand 1: 52.3790 % [ 00.46 00.07 ] { AA-99, AKs-AJs, KQs, AKo-AJo, KQo } Hand 2: 47.6210 % [ 00.41 00.07 ] { AQo } [/ QUOTE ] Ding, ding. We have a winner. [/ QUOTE ] What about the dead money in the blinds? 10% of the average pot? Add that in! |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: John Feeney\'s AQ test on Party
What about the dead money in the blinds? 10% of the average pot? Add that in! You can't add that in. Or to be more precise, there are so many things to add in (implied odds, betting, folding, other players who may have AA, etc...) that the only way to properly account for them all is to use something like TTH to run simulations. - Andrew www.pokerstove.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: John Feeney\'s AQ test on Party
[ QUOTE ]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- What do you do with AQ off in MP and on button when an unknown UTG raises. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fold [/ QUOTE ] 3-bet. [ QUOTE ] Against a winning player like you skp it's an easy 3 bet. There are too many hands in your range from 77-AA, KQ offsuit or suited and up to make AQ offsuit an easy 3 bet. [/ QUOTE ] If I knew it was SKP, i would fold for sure. In general, we disagree on some basic things Lawrence. In this instance, we are exactly opposite. |
|
|