|
|
#42
05-30-2005, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
I would rather drink ammonia than play Texas Hold 'Em with a 13% VPIP. [/ QUOTE ] I understand where you're comming from, but it's not THAT bad. Consider that between the higher rake and 1/3 strucutre you're playing your SB a LOT less in 3/6 than 15/30. An 18% VP$IP is a pretty good balance for this game, depending table texture, etc. Consider, that most of the 3/6 tables I play are like 2-3 horrible players and the rest of the seats filled by a mix of rocks, TAggs and semi-aware players. 
|
|
#43
05-30-2005, 07:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
I understand where you're comming from, but it's not THAT bad. [/ QUOTE ] Even with a horrible rake structure, I'm certain that playing 13-14% of your hands at $3/6 is pretty bad. Rob
|
|
#44
05-30-2005, 07:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Hmm... that makes sense. Perhaps I should spend some more time finding good tables. [/ QUOTE ] If nothing else you'll make a lot more $$$
|
|
#45
05-30-2005, 07:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Even with a horrible rake structure, I'm certain that playing 13-14% of your hands at $3/6 is pretty bad. [/ QUOTE ] Checking some of my old 2/4 stats, vpip 16.3%. I'm not really sure where I make all these incorrect folds. My 3/6 stats is only over 2500 hands and with a vpip at 13.8%. 2500 hands is not much but for judging vpip it's decent, right? I'm sure I won't get over 15% playing the way I do now.
|
|
#46
05-30-2005, 08:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
I would rather drink ammonia than play Texas Hold 'Em with a 13% VPIP. [/ QUOTE ] I find this both interesting and perplexing.
|
|
#47
05-30-2005, 08:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Checking some of my old 2/4 stats, vpip 16.3%. I'm not really sure where I make all these incorrect folds. My 3/6 stats is only over 2500 hands and with a vpip at 13.8%. 2500 hands is not much but for judging vpip it's decent, right? I'm sure I won't get over 15% playing the way I do now. [/ QUOTE ] When the table is silly loose, you should be limping drawing hands. Went the table is mixed, stealing blinds, stealing buttons and isolating bad players. You can also 3-bet thinking TAggs who raise pre-flop aggressivly with a pretty wide range.
|
|
#48
05-30-2005, 08:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
Checking some of my old 2/4 stats, vpip 16.3%. I'm not really sure where I make all these incorrect folds. [/ QUOTE ] You are probably not cold calling enough. IMO, SSHE (though brilliant) might have made us too afraid to cold call. VPIP is pretty accurate over that many hands, btw.
|
|
#50
05-30-2005, 09:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Moving to 3/6 (low content)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You are probably not cold calling enough. IMO, SSHE (though brilliant) might have made us too afraid to cold call. [/ QUOTE ] Care to elaberate? [/ QUOTE ] It might be slightly biased towards my game, but, as someone, who, in the past 2 months has gone from like 16/9, to 18.5/11, I found most of the VPIP increase didnt come from hands in which I was raising. It came from hands in which I could cold call proftably.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
