|
|
#451
07-15-2005, 01:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
[ QUOTE ]
it only can really work in big buy-in tournaments against old-school tight players (i.e. from the McEvoy school). Try the System in a few low buy-in online tournaments and you'll either be a chip leader or out in 10 minutes. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely, 100% NOT true. The system as described in the most recend edition of TPFAP will have you folding for at least the first 10 minutes. You will only start going all-in if you have AA or KK (or maybe AKs) in the first 10 minutes. It isn't until the blinds go up significantly that you will start going in with less. 
|
|
#452
07-15-2005, 01:58 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] She's out. Thank [censored] god. [/ QUOTE ] Video of the final hand:  [/ QUOTE ] nh! POTD [/ QUOTE ] Aw crap, I don't get it. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I wan to laugh too. Someone explain this please, implying I am an idiot if necessary.
|
|
#453
07-15-2005, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it only can really work in big buy-in tournaments against old-school tight players (i.e. from the McEvoy school). Try the System in a few low buy-in online tournaments and you'll either be a chip leader or out in 10 minutes. [/ QUOTE ] Absolutely, 100% NOT true. The system as described in the most recend edition of TPFAP will have you folding for at least the first 10 minutes. You will only start going all-in if you have AA or KK (or maybe AKs) in the first 10 minutes. It isn't until the blinds go up significantly that you will start going in with less. [/ QUOTE ] You are right. I hadn't looked at the chapter about the System in quite a while and have never actually used it. I see that it would be a while before you'd play a pot unless you got dealt a monster early. I still stand by the point that Sklansky assumed no one would risk their tournament life pre-flop in the early levels of the WSOP ME without a monster. Anyone who has played low or medium buy-in online tourneys have seen people happily call all-ins with unbelievable hands.
|
|
#454
07-15-2005, 02:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
The implication is of course that its a video, yet she's sitting there doing nothing like she's done all tournament long.
|
|
#455
07-15-2005, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] She's out. Thank [censored] god. [/ QUOTE ] Video of the final hand: [/ QUOTE ] nh! POTD [/ QUOTE ] Aw crap, I don't get it. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] I wan to laugh too. Someone explain this please, implying I am an idiot if necessary. [/ QUOTE ] she's H-dog, Human Delay of Game. She takes forever, and thats here sitting there taking for ever. Its alright Emmitt I got your back.
|
|
#456
07-15-2005, 02:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Williamson Doubles up Against Hachem
so much hate! <3 for tiffany
|
|
#457
07-15-2005, 02:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RAYMER OUT?!
god stop talking
|
|
#459
07-15-2005, 02:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: RAYMER OUT?!
I'll get right on that.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
