#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another TT Hand
This sim is not very useful. You need to see how TT plays with the three cold-callers. If you give them reasonable hands (that's being generous) like 65s, 44, and J9o (one more overcard to TT, you get a better feel for TT's equity in this pot.
As Ks 256099 30.11 593612 69.78 957 0.11 0.301 Tc Th 221893 26.08 627818 73.80 957 0.11 0.261 6d 5d 135432 15.92 714279 83.97 957 0.11 0.159 9s Jd 121825 14.32 727886 85.57 957 0.11 0.143 4c 4h 114462 13.46 735249 86.43 957 0.11 0.135 |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another TT Hand
I actualy ran one after that with 'reasonable' hands, 65s and 55 being two of them and QJo being the other...nearly the same result.
Thanks, Joe |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another TT Hand
If you fool around with this stuff, you'll see something valuable.
QJ kills TT's equity because all four overcards are out there and live. However, if you put AJ into the mix, TT's value goes up by deadening the Aces a bit and taking away the dangerous Q. If neither a Queen or Jack is in opposing players' hands, TT does great. cards win %win lose %lose tie %tie EV As Ks 227393 26.73 615843 72.40 7432 0.87 0.271 Tc Th 314420 36.96 534896 62.88 1352 0.16 0.370 6d 5d 139230 16.37 710086 83.47 1352 0.16 0.164 9s Ad 47101 5.54 796135 93.59 7432 0.87 0.059 4c 4h 115092 13.53 734224 86.31 1352 0.16 0.136 |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Another TT Hand
VERY NICE!
Should I consider such a cold call in this situation? Do you? I was basing my arguement on UTG's raise, granted not all these situations can be completely explained in this vacuum, however, I believed a set was needed to win and the 3-cold callers were borderline. Now, I'm just starting to incorporate implied odds into my play and it's situations like this I find myself on the fence. I appreciate your help. Great sim, Joe |
|
|