Riddle me this...

The majority of my $11s have been 4tabling. I've just started 6tabling them over the last few hundred. These are done in sets.

I've 1, 2, and 4tabled the $22s and all have the same success (or lack thereof).

go check out irieguys posts about variance they should give you an answer.

FYI when I did my first 1000 10+1 sngs I had an ROI of 9% on my eurobet account and 39% on my empire account with about 500 tourneys a piece. I would play 4 tables of both at the same time and the only thing that can explain the differences between the two would be variance. Just keep grinding and looking back at old HH to see if there were holes in your play.

[GtrHtr]

[ QUOTE ]
The majority of my $11s have been 4tabling. I've just started 6tabling them over the last few hundred. These are done in sets.

I've 1, 2, and 4tabled the $22s and all have the same success (or lack thereof).

[/ QUOTE ]

Interesting. Here is what I do to refocus myself. I review every HH after each game through SNGPT and hand by hand in the text file. I look for situations where I missed a read, push, impact of a stack/impact of my stack (FE), and post flop play in the early rounds if I was in a hand.

Also, I single table when I'm going through a downswing - as soon as I ID the downswing - 8 in a row is normal. When I single table I focus on every play, every bet, every fold of every hand - even the ones I'm not in - particularly the ones I'm not in. When I finish, I go back and review (as stated above) that game, even if I win. I find this helps a lot and I play my best when I single table like this. I identify my leaks my opponents leaks etc. I may spend 8-10 hours playing like this until I'm ready to play more tables. What I find is that I handle variance much better now and that I can regain any losses in $ while at the same time tightening up my game. Time consuming yes, but well worth it IMO.