|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Did the addition of the 75/150 blind level change the average length of time each 10+1 stt takes? | |||
| yes |
   
|
25 | 71.43% |
| no |
  
|
10 | 28.57% |
| Voters: 35. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
10-08-2005, 03:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
[ QUOTE ]
I would fold....I put big stack on 88+, AJ+; SB on default-Average; and BB on default-Loose, and I got +0.5 when discounting 50% for next BB/SB. Seems to me the blinds are more likely to be looser than tighter than these ranges, hence the fold....I dunno, I guess Irie and deathpotato and the rest of the guys who said push think the villains will be tighter than the ranges I specified? Or do you think +0.2-+0.5 here is enough to make pushing very clear? [/ QUOTE ] The big stack rates to be a bit looser than that... but I think you are way off on the blinds, particularly the SB. this is a 109 and the short stacks like to play "who can fold into the money," a lot more at that level than the lower ones. Irieguy 
|
|
#32
10-08-2005, 03:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I would fold....I put big stack on 88+, AJ+; SB on default-Average; and BB on default-Loose, and I got +0.5 when discounting 50% for next BB/SB. Seems to me the blinds are more likely to be looser than tighter than these ranges, hence the fold....I dunno, I guess Irie and deathpotato and the rest of the guys who said push think the villains will be tighter than the ranges I specified? Or do you think +0.2-+0.5 here is enough to make pushing very clear? [/ QUOTE ] The big stack rates to be a bit looser than that... but I think you are way off on the blinds, particularly the SB. this is a 109 and the short stacks like to play "who can fold into the money," a lot more at that level than the lower ones. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] Ugh, why can't all opponents just play the same way.
|
|
#34
10-08-2005, 03:41 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
[ QUOTE ]
this is a 109 and the short stacks like to play "who can fold into the money," a lot more at that level than the lower ones. Irieguy [/ QUOTE ] I gotta move up.
|
|
#35
10-08-2005, 03:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
[ QUOTE ]
You'd rather be in the CO than BTN for an open push? No way....only if I have a really big hand. This hand here isn't that really big hand. Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] One reason I said "kind of," is that it really depends on a few things. But I'm a pretty agressive player in these kind of spots, and I can't tell you how many times I'm been called down lately with all kinds of hands like this when I push from the button (in the 109s and 215s). And a lot of situations like this the small blind will fold something like KQ or A8 here more to me from a cutoff raise than a button raise. The main worry here is the big stack, and he has to have by far the tightest range of anyone in this hand. So overall I think whether or not it's better in a spot like this to raise from cutoff or button depends on your image and how sharp the other players are. And I completely disagree with you about having a "big hand." If I had a really big hand, I'd MUCH rather push from the button, because it's going to be interpretted way more often as a steal and will thus get called more.
|
|
#36
10-08-2005, 04:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
Push it.
Minraising is bad here as the blinds won't mind stop n going here or just calling to catch a good flop since they are still far from ITM. And for those who said that they would push all in as the bigstack in this situation with a wide range over a cutoff minraiser is probably overplaying their stack and losing it often. Bad play as well, IMO.
|
|
#37
10-08-2005, 04:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
not that close? i disagree because i want to know which way you are so decisively leaning with no reads and no info about previous hands? I think its close enough that there is not nearly enough info in the op to determine the correct decision.
|
|
#38
10-08-2005, 04:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
Mathematically you have all the information you need. Put your callers on the ranges they should be calling with and you can figure it out.
|
|
#40
10-08-2005, 04:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 109 interesting spot.. POLL TIME!!
Come on now with the semantics of the situation. What do you want, a list of reads for the table? 60% of the players here 8-table. Many hands are played without any reads at all. If there is no way to answer the question without more information, then I guess that you are the only person that makes sense in this thread. Poker is a game of incomplete information, anyways; And once again I can assure you that in this part of the forums you won't be making a lot of replys to posts based on the reads that an OP threw in there.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
