|
|
#32
10-05-2005, 05:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I stereotyped...and I was wrong.
[ QUOTE ]
hehe good luck with that... I think just calling is fine. If he checks to you on the river... Do you check behind? [/ QUOTE ] No, they aren't good enough to checkraise the river, so I bet with impunity. 
|
|
#33
10-05-2005, 05:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I stereotyped...and I was wrong.
t.t
apologies for not seeing the flush. (i rely on converter) i just could not imagine someone not 3 betting this *nonflush board. but ok u lose to a lot of suited aces. hands u beat- AJ KQ AK KJ QQ AA, hell I even thought TT, 99 -- are possible. its a beautiful looking board and ure almost guaranteed to fire again regardless of holding and that looks like a great turn to c/r on even though the king makes him swallow his own spit. u lose to Ax hearts Qx hearts KK JJ and i guess A3. In this hand, I think I raise a non heart river and if I can take villain at this much face value fold to 3 bet. I still relaly want another bet in here.
|
|
#35
10-05-2005, 05:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I stereotyped...and I was wrong.
Like I've addressed in other areas, many/most of the hands listed are nearly impossible. This is not somebody who is going to checkraise the turn when an overcard hits, so QQ, AJ, etc are impossible (except maybe AhJx). KQ mucks on the flop. Did you read my player and game description?
The problem with raising the river is I think I'm behind. Anybody who understands reads and math thinks I'm behind. But again, most importantly, this thread was not supposed to be about 32s vs AA. It was about other things. Things that matter in life. Josh
|
|
#38
10-05-2005, 06:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: I stereotyped...and I was wrong.
Holy this post sucks bad.
Stop stereotyping if you feel like a c@ck when you stereotype incorrectly. Thread over.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
