How easy are the $50 NL on party? - Page 4

#31 08-30-2005, 01:24 PM

I have noticed on Party at least that ever since they have added higher stakes in the NL, (400-2000) the quality players migrated north leaving the small stakes games infested with awful players. 25-100 limits are not that difficult. I think though you will see a marked change in difficulty when you graduate to 200 and even more so from 400 on up. Below that though, bad players are a dime a dozen. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

JihadOnTheRiver · #32 08-30-2005, 01:33 PM

[ QUOTE ]
abc can beat the 200's but not for a great bb/100. you really have to semibluff and pounce on pots

[/ QUOTE ]

That is ABC to most

crosse91 · #33 08-30-2005, 01:54 PM

no its not, trust me. Its borderline chip-spewing.

TheWorstPlayer · #34 08-30-2005, 01:56 PM

[ QUOTE ]
no its not, trust me. Its borderline chip-spewing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ghazban · #35 08-30-2005, 05:19 PM

No, I didn't step down when I switched. I'm an arrogant bastard [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]

Raven · #36 08-30-2005, 05:31 PM

I can tell you that there is a lot more fish in the 6 max tables compared to the full ring tables in 400 nl too. Also there are not a lot of full 600 nl tables going on usually.

Spaded · #37 08-30-2005, 08:20 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Also, every table has 2 good players, 4-5 avg. players, and then 2 fish about. So you just have play the fish.

[/ QUOTE ]

And since les than 10% of all poker players are long-term winners, that should be money in the bank.