|
|
#31
08-26-2005, 02:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
You're right, Dynasty.
In fact, I think they lovingly refer to him as "Uncle Joe." (Seriously, this is what they call him.) 
|
|
#32
08-26-2005, 02:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
Please go on further with your hypothesis. What makes you so certain this "take-over" would occur during that time period? Is it because America's hands would be full with the red army during the 60's or what?
Please explain your intellectual brilliance.
|
|
#33
08-26-2005, 03:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
[ QUOTE ]
Please go on further with your hypothesis. What makes you so certain this "take-over" would occur during that time period? Is it because America's hands would be full with the red army during the 60's or what? Please explain your intellectual brilliance. [/ QUOTE ] No. There would be no red army in this other "dimension." They would have been defeated by the Nazi's, remember? The invasion would be staged from England and Iceland and Greenland. Maybe a few atomic bombs would be dropped on the major east coast cities to "soften up" the land invasion. You must realize that had Germany conquered Russia and the rest of Europe that their industrial/manpower/resources would be greater than that of America's. In this case all that would be required is a building up of superior forces. Remeber that the German's had missiles way before the U.S did (V1 and V2 bombs.) Had this scenario occured German technology would have far surpassed that of America's. Plus, America would have been the sole remaining power, plus Germany would have had the Japanese as allies to attack on America's western front/coast. Facing a two front war American would be destroyed (As the two front war destroyed the Germans in WW1 and WW2 and Napolean in the war of 1812 and every other nation in history that had to fight on two fronts at once.) Also, I never said the 60's I said the 50's or 60's. Hell, it might have even been finished by the late 40's, but I feel they would need time to build up a overwhelmingly superior naval force to ensure the land invasion's success.
|
|
#35
08-26-2005, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
[ QUOTE ]
the winner writes the history books. i still voted no....... [/ QUOTE ] But yet you admit that I am your intellectual superior, right?
|
|
#36
08-26-2005, 03:11 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the winner writes the history books. i still voted no....... [/ QUOTE ] But yet you admit that I am your intellectual superior, right? [/ QUOTE ] ummm.....wrong character....
|
|
#37
08-26-2005, 03:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
Ok, I see your point. If Russia had been taken over, there would be too much for America to handle. The Japs on the left and Germany/Russia on the right would cause overwhelming stress on our nation's military power.
Do you think, however, that the next stage for America would be to call upon her allies as well?
|
|
#38
08-26-2005, 05:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
[ QUOTE ]
Ok, I see your point. If Russia had been taken over, there would be too much for America to handle. The Japs on the left and Germany/Russia on the right would cause overwhelming stress on our nation's military power. Do you think, however, that the next stage for America would be to call upon her allies as well? [/ QUOTE ] The only remaining ally of America's would have been Canada. In fact, Canada would probably have been invaded first via Greenland.
|
|
#39
08-26-2005, 06:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
unless he took over the entire world, history is documented and spread well enough for him to still seem like a maniac to most of the world.
|
|
#40
08-26-2005, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Was Hitler right when he said.........
[ QUOTE ]
If you choose no, I hope you will explain yourself. And you DO owe me an explanation, for I am your intellectual superior. [/ QUOTE ] I don't owe you an explanation for that or any other reason, real or contrived. Given that there are many people arguing that Hitler is not or should not be the most despised, you have no basic argument. Reference at least one post regarding Stalin on this forum. There are other obvious examples, I am sure.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
