|
|
#31
08-02-2005, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hunt for Red October [/ QUOTE ] Nice work. Maybe I should have made a gimmick account of that admiral dude. [/ QUOTE ] Better yet, of characters played by Fred Thompson. For a US Senator, he's a damn good actor. [/ QUOTE ] That would have been good. *sigh* [/window of opportunity] 
|
|
#32
08-02-2005, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
I didn't realize he'd been a senator that long!
|
|
#34
08-02-2005, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
[ QUOTE ]
Don't worry, OOT has a memory span of 6 minutes, and nobody reads these posts anyway. [/ QUOTE ] No. Some [censored], probably Jake, will remember this and bring it back up in 6 months when you try to make a funny.
|
|
#35
08-02-2005, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Don't worry, OOT has a memory span of 6 minutes, and nobody reads these posts anyway. [/ QUOTE ] No. Some [censored], probably Jake, will remember this and bring it back up in 6 months when you try to make a funny. [/ QUOTE ] You know, I really don't think a-hole should be filtered. It does bring a little bit of flavor and a different meaning than f-er, which is what everyone will assume I wrote there. When will these fuckers get the damned filter right?
|
|
#36
08-02-2005, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Don't worry, OOT has a memory span of 6 minutes, and nobody reads these posts anyway. [/ QUOTE ] No. Some [censored], probably Jake, will remember this and bring it back up in 6 months when you try to make a funny. [/ QUOTE ] Don't worry, I'm far too lazy for a GA. Just creating my avatar the other night took 5 years off my life.
|
|
#37
08-02-2005, 05:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Arg... could we please get rid of the mods?
[ QUOTE ]
Overall, I think having mods is a great move for 2+2, but I can't see any positive from having them be anonymous. This is a community and it makes sense to have some people help keep the community within reasonable standards. I think any good mod would be willing to take responsibility for his judgement calls. If they make a mistake, they can accept feedback from the community and get better at their task. Hell, even the guy who banned SpicyF due to a personal squabble outside of 2+2 has been reinstated as a mod. I can't think of a worse abuse of power by a mod, yet that received just a little slap on the wrist. If mods have such complete authority over the community, at least let them be accountable for their actions (via their anonymous online personas!). As things stand, anonymous mods sort of act in a vacuum, making it tougher for a good status quo to be achieved. [/ QUOTE ] This is a real good post.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
