#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vinny Vinh is a piece of sh*t
Nope, I would'nt take advantage of the stupid rule. I also won't take advantage of a guy who is exposing his cards. I'm not playing to angle shoot, I want to win because I'm good, not because I can find some angle to exploit. It's a BS way to win.
I wish it had been me so I could have rip off an F-bomb too and say now lets get back to playiog poker. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vinny Vinh is a piece of sh*t
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe your friend Raffi was being too gay? [/ QUOTE ] lol |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vinny Vinh is a piece of sh*t
maybe I'm an [censored] but after I win, I would lobbed a few f-bombs towards Vinny and the the guy that made the decision
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vinny Vinh is a piece of sh*t
[ QUOTE ]
Enforcing the rule in this way is against the rule-framer's intent. [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure if I agree, though I certainly don't disagree. I assume you agree with me that the rule framers intent is NOT "no dealer abuse" or else that's what the rule would be. As such, I'm begining to think that the rule is designed to eliminate the f-word, predominantly for TV purposes. But I certainly don't think we can assume the intent is to eliminate abuse. [ QUOTE ] Blindly following laws is evil. ~D [/ QUOTE ] I concur. But I don't think it is evil to enforce rules. There is a difference between abiding by rules and following rules. Does anybody have any reason to think if the situation was reversed (ie vinny cussed and rami called him on it) that the ruling would be different? If you think so, then I'd ask why. If you don't think so, then you can't say it's unfair. Josh |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Vinny Vinh is a piece of sh*t
Were there other problems between them prior to the alleged incident? In any case I think the F bomb rule is a absolute jopke and if Vinny encouraged the rule being called then that is a seriously lame, albeit succesful, attempt at getting an edge.
|
|
|