|
|
#31
06-29-2005, 12:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Jessica Simpson in Daisy Dukes
This is sacrilege.
Nancy Sinatra's 'boots' is sexy because she's stong and independent and beautiful. Simpson is idiotic, weak, needy/ dependent. Yuck! 
|
|
#33
06-29-2005, 12:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jessica Simpson in Daisy Dukes
[ QUOTE ]
Nancy Sinatra's 'boots' is sexy because she's stong and independent and beautiful. Simpson is idiotic, weak, needy/ dependent. Yuck! [/ QUOTE ] I don't think anyone here is planning to marry her. This is more about [censored]-ability. But yes, I think we established in the thread a week ago that this version of an already mediocre song really sucks ass.
|
|
#35
06-29-2005, 01:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jessica Simpson in Daisy Dukes
She seems to have real trouble looking dirty as this song would call for. Everytime she's shaking her ass, you see a silly-goofy-"this is fun!" smile on her face, when her expression should be one of pure cock-hunger to pull the whole image off. Seriously, if she's going to go slutty, she needs to get it fixed. Take a look at Christina for example--a perfect whore-look on her face at all times.
http://www.christinazone.com/copperm...at=0&pos=2
|
|
#36
06-29-2005, 01:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jessica Simpson in Daisy Dukes
[ QUOTE ]
Take a look at Christina for example--a perfect whore-look on her face at all times. http://www.christinazone.com/copperm...at=0&pos=2 [/ QUOTE ] that is correct.
|
|
#37
06-29-2005, 02:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jessica Simpson in Daisy Dukes
[ QUOTE ]
Mandy Moore wins, and its not even close [/ QUOTE ] AND she's 5'9" (the other three are pretty short) submitted for your approval:     and more here
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
