|
|
#31
06-26-2005, 08:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Member # 12
[ QUOTE ]
I was surfing 2+2 at the beginning of 2000, then left because of the Abdul Jalib thing with Mason.. then [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, that really sucked. So many silly ego-driven tiffs back then. 
|
|
#33
06-26-2005, 08:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
[ QUOTE ]
The 2nd to last person to register on 09.02.2002 is my man Uston. MMMMMM was the first person to register on 09.03.2002, member #196 overall. [/ QUOTE ] And I believe it might have been earlier had the new system not screwed me by refusing to accept my old single letter username. Seriously, what could be the point of requiring usernames to consist of multiple characters? Presumably the system holds as unique each registered username...I can't think of any good reason why it would be programmed to reject single character usernames. Any ideas as to why floating around in that bright head of yours, Clarkmeister? (or anyone else too, of course;-)) It's fairly baffling to me. I used to do some forms programming and can't conceive of why the field would have to start with a minimum of more than one (or three, or whatever the minimum actually was) characters. Hmmmmm, Clarkmeister...if you can't conjure up the reason maybe El Diablo can. But this may be beyond even his powers too (without finding out from the source why, if there even IS a why). Left scratching my head in puzzlement, M
|
|
#34
06-26-2005, 08:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
...and the rtage comes flooding back... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
[ QUOTE ] And I believe it might have been earlier had the new system not screwed me by refusing to accept single letter usernames. Seriously, what could be the point of requiring usernames to consist of multiple characters? Presumably the system holds as unique each registered username...I can't think of any good reason why it would be programmed to reject single character usernames. Any ideas as to why floating around in that bright head of yours, Clarkmeister? (or anyone else too, of course;-)) It's fairly baffling to me. I used to do some forms programming and can't conceive of why the field would have to start with a minimum of more than one (or three, or whatever the minimum actually was) characters. Hmmmmm, Clarkmeister...if you can't conjure up the reason maybe El Diablo can. But this may be beyond even his powers too (without finding out from the source why, if there even IS a why). Left wondering, M [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#36
06-26-2005, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] and the rtage comes flooding back... [/ QUOTE ] what is rtage? [/ QUOTE ] That would be typo-ese for rage. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#37
06-26-2005, 09:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
Did you ever ask Chuck?
|
|
#39
06-26-2005, 09:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
[ QUOTE ]
#4857 meh. [/ QUOTE ] One full year too late.
|
|
#40
06-26-2005, 10:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Member # 12
#2406.
I remember how small it seemed back then with only ~2500. What the hell was it like here on September 5? Clarkmeister: Hey Dynasty. How ya doin? Dynasty: Good. Clarkmeister: Sooooooooooooooooo, who would win in a hypothetical animal tournament? A tiger or a hippo? Dynasty: What? CM: Pretend there was an 8 animal tournamnet . . . so who would win between a tiger and a hippo? Dynasty: Put down the bong, Clark. CM: Oh, btw, Illinois basketball is going to be really good this year. Dynasty: Yeah, you, uh, talked to me about this at the 20/40 game today. I still don't care. MS Sunshine: Dutch Boyd owes me $56,000! CM: Well, I just wanted to post it out there for discussion. Dynasty: I'm signing off now. Good luck with your animal tournament. I hope the Hippo wins. MS Sunshine: The Tiger would win!!! . . . . . . . . . . The Tiger! GRRRRRRRRRRR! . . . . . . . . . . . . . Guys??? -AA
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
