![]() |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jason brought it up.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
this thread is what?
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S-O-A-P-Y.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Fuld defined a clutch hitter as one who hits better at more important moments. [/ QUOTE ] so, what he did was use data and applly it to his definition of a clutch hitter. How did this crap even get printed? [/ QUOTE ] Is there another,generally accepted, defination that you would prefer? |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
this thread is what? [/ QUOTE ] Gay. A lot of people mentioned on how the hot tub was getting old, so I decided this would be a good substitute. Me = wrong? |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Fuld defined a clutch hitter as one who hits better at more important moments. [/ QUOTE ] so, what he did was use data and applly it to his definition of a clutch hitter. How did this crap even get printed? [/ QUOTE ] Is there another,generally accepted, defination that you would prefer? [/ QUOTE ]how about we use a definition which that doesn't rely on completely objective situations to define it? |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
yes. it just isn't in the same league as the hot tub.
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would be kinda hard to do a statistical analysis with a subjective definition. I wonder how many people back in the 1800's said "Some moron has decided taht cretain situations count as at bats, and other cituations ount as hits, and he has created a statistic called batting avereage based on his own definitons. How does this crap even get printed?"
|
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
yes. it just isn't in the same league as the hot tub. [/ QUOTE ] Fine, I'll continue my quest for a new one. The point remains in tact though, posting about poker in OOT = the gay. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
your example is horrible. One can easily define what an at bat is, and what a hit is. Defining what a big moment is, is simply ridiculous. two people could have completely different definitions for a big moment.
|
![]() |
|
|