Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: 5 vs 12
Neo 83 69.75%
Papa Smurf 36 30.25%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 05-05-2005, 10:48 PM
Phoenix1010 Phoenix1010 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Where the beer flows like wine
Posts: 282
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

This is Zeppelin all the way... I've never understood this love affair with the Beatles. They made some great pop songs, had two great song writers, but calling them the prototype is pretty ridiculous.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:15 PM
Soul Daddy Soul Daddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hurricanes, animal corpses and your potential new tattoo have a lot in common. Think about it.
Posts: 463
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
They made some great pop songs, had two great song writers, but calling them the prototype is pretty ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]
No, it's not. Have you actually listened to them, beyond the "yeah yeah yeah" songs? Not being smart, okay maybe a little, it's just hard for me to believe that anyone who has could think they just "made some great pop songs." They introduced a myriad of musical styles to the biggest audience ever, making the success of bands like Zeppelin possible.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:16 PM
CardSharpCook CardSharpCook is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South of Heaven
Posts: 746
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

Zeppelin. And it not even close.

CSC
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:57 PM
tpir90036 tpir90036 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 563
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
It's a tough one, since they're my two favorite bands, but I had to go with Zeppelin.

[/ QUOTE ]
Me too... I left out the part about musical ability because I don't feel like arguing that point between these two groups.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:57 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Zepplin's a glorified hair band.

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

I like they're music, but they were a precursor to all the 80's hairbands.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:58 PM
JoshuaD JoshuaD is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 341
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
This is Zeppelin all the way... I've never understood this love affair with the Beatles. They made some great pop songs, had two great song writers, but calling them the prototype is pretty ridiculous.

[/ QUOTE ]

Give all they're albums a listen, they are way more than "pop".
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-05-2005, 11:59 PM
Soul Daddy Soul Daddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hurricanes, animal corpses and your potential new tattoo have a lot in common. Think about it.
Posts: 463
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
I like they're music, but they were a precursor to all the 80's hairbands.

[/ QUOTE ]
That's not their fault. Don't let Winger ruin LZ's legacy in your mind.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-06-2005, 12:00 AM
miajag81 miajag81 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: College Park, MD
Posts: 9
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Zepplin's a glorified hair band.

[/ QUOTE ]

wtf?

[/ QUOTE ]

I like they're music, but they were a precursor to all the 80's hairbands.

[/ QUOTE ]

The Beatles were a precursor to the Monkees. What's your point?
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 05-06-2005, 01:02 AM
7ontheline 7ontheline is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: My dog will eat MicroBob\'s cat.
Posts: 339
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

[ QUOTE ]
The Rolling Stones>The Beatles>Zep

Easy

[/ QUOTE ]

I like both the Beatles and Zeppelin. I think I would take the Beatles by a hair. And the above quote is one of the most ignorant things I have ever read in all of OOT. ALL OF OOT, I SAY!
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 05-06-2005, 01:59 AM
augie00 augie00 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1
Default Re: Beatles vs. Led Zeppelin

This whole thread is dumb. How can you even compare The Beatles to Led Zeppelin? The Beatles are responsible for a lot of the music that we listen to today. Anyone who answers Zeppelin simply doesn't know enough about The Beatles.

edit: that is assuming of course, that this thread is "which is the better band" rather than "which is your favorite band"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.