|
|
#32
04-13-2005, 04:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Let\'s talk about river bets
[ QUOTE ]
So if you check-call, what hands is a passive opponent betting on that river that you're beating when you call? [/ QUOTE ] This is a good question. I think he will bet with an Ace pretty high percentage of the time (although we're chopping if that's the case), and he would probably bet a Queen another small percentage of the time. He would also call with an Ace. I'm not sure he would call with a Queen, although he probably would since he called the turn bet. 
|
|
#33
04-13-2005, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s talk about river bets
I guess this just goes against my nature to raise and see where I stand.
|
|
#35
04-13-2005, 05:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s talk about river bets
[ QUOTE ]
In other words I guess he's pretty much an unknown. [/ QUOTE ] A 50/1 unknown, I may bet...an unknown 2/4, I'd check...
|
|
#36
04-13-2005, 05:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Let\'s talk about river bets
so what are the better hands that you could make fold
a Kx will raise as would a flush... I think a AK/AQ/trips would have raised on the turn, even for a passive... And if he has a worse hand, he'd probably fold on the completed flush So I'd say check/fold, as you are probably beat if the passive bets (and your read is correct enough)
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
