#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
Typo, meant to say "wouldn't". Post has been edited.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
Typo, meant to say "wouldn't". Post has been edited. [/ QUOTE ] Were you the villain in said hand? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
eggzactly
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
I'll often do goofy stuff like this when I have AA and KK to induce a push from a thinking aggressive player (and I think the most likely outcome for me is to win the blinds anyway). [/ QUOTE ] i have seen people do this a good amount. i think its more likely than a misclick. fold. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
If you assume that his typo-appearing bet is a mistake and move in, aren't you really thinking at the 2nd-highest level? Wouldn't he be thinking at a higher level to try to induce this play?
Of course, in this sense, it's erroneous to talk about thinking at the "highest level," since your opponent would be thinking at a higher level if he was aware of which particular level you were thinking at... it's like talking about the "highest integer"... |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
Yea if he had been playing solid and he does this to induce an all in he is working your brown hole.
Even if he isnt, he is getting about 2:1 on his money to call an all in, so he probably would call with any ace or two face cards anyways... so you're effed |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
maybe he has dueces and is trying to steal the blind. if that is the case even if he calls you are a coin flip
|
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
[ QUOTE ]
maybe he has dueces and is trying to steal the blind. if that is the case even if he calls you are a coin flip [/ QUOTE ] he is not some low limit online hack raising 10bb with a PP to steal the blinds. i think AA-QQ, AKs, or a misclick is way more likely than the above. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
did it actually happen? if so, what happened
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Thinking at the Highest Level
All of this is clearly academic. Judging by Kane's posts in the past which are all in a similar vein of vanity posts with little content, he's only going to tell us when he makes some similarly 'brilliant' maneuver. If he'd gotten burned by someone pulling a move with AA or KK, he wouldn't be telling us about it.
|
|
|