|
|
#31
02-17-2005, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Hand reading exercise?
Well, The hands I can put him on at this point at A-10, AJ, AQ, AK or in some instances Trips off the flop, although he probobly would have re-raised due to the flush draw.
So out of the 4 hands that you can narrow him down to at this point, giving that he is a tight-aggresive player, You can beat one of the hands, tie one of the hands, and lose to two of them. In my opinion, its a losing proposition. If he is a looser type I might cold-call to the river, definetely not re-raising unless I hit my Q. 
|
|
#32
02-17-2005, 10:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hand reading exercise?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 3-betting this turn would be bad. If we assume villain has AK-AJ and TT you're ahead of 8 combos of AJ, chopping with 6 combos of AQ and losing to 17 combos of AK/AT/TT. If he has KK/QQ/JJ he's most likely folding if you 3-bet. [/ QUOTE ] At least somebody finally thought about the combinations of hands we're ahead of vs. behind and what hands we may not want to raise that we are ahead of. Thank you bakku. [/ QUOTE ] pshea, dont give bakku that much credit. he doesn't even know how to count card combinations properly. [/ QUOTE ] lol, dude i got that other thing we were talking about right finally. That it took me 30 minutes is another story..
|
|
#33
02-17-2005, 10:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Hand reading exercise?
[ QUOTE ]
pshea, dont give bakku that much credit. he doesn't even know how to count card combinations properly. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Seriously though, everyone in the thread agrees on a range of AJ-AK or better hands than AQ and then half of the people say raise/3-bet/cap...whatever. You don't need to be a math whiz to figure out that you're <50% here and the only hands he's folding are ones you don't really want him to fold.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
