Me vs Negraneau vs Lindgren - Bahamas Recap

[frank_iii]

I can't believe how quickly this great post has devolved...or maybe I can.

Anyway, great job SharkBait. Hopefully you'll get further next time so you can write more. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[jakethebake]

[ QUOTE ]
nit (noun): a person who gets upset over stupid poker minutiae such as people not calling three of a kind by the "proper" set/trips nomenclature. probably kills the action of good games by talking about pot odds, 2+2, and explaining "domination" to people after taking a beat. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

No, no, no. You've got it wrong. That's an anal-retentive moron. A nit is The egg or young of a parasitic insect, such as a louse. I realize these are much the same thing, but surely any experienced poker player wouldn't make this noob mistake when speaking. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[SharkBait]

I'll be sure to "correct" Daniel's poker grammar next time.

Thanks for reading all.

[SossMan]

[ QUOTE ]
River card is a T. Well isn't that nice. Quad tens, the nuts. I try to figure out how much I can get from him.

[/ QUOTE ]

That may have been the worst card in the deck for you (except another 3).

[stinkypete]

[ QUOTE ]

Sklansky has used the word "trips" before to describe two in your hand and one on the board, so I don't think it's a gigantic deal if someone uses them interchangeably.

[/ QUOTE ]

there is nothing incorrect about using trips that way. trips is the more general term. sets are a subset of trips.

that's the equivalent of saying that since all spades are black, all black cards are spades.