Einstein versus......

[jdl22]

Apparently John von Neumann sucked at poker. One would expect him to be much better than Einstein so I'm going to go with Sklansky.

[Evan]

I think Einstein would be in trouble against far weaker players than David Sklansky. Honestly, I would bet on myself in the scenario you described. Poker is not a very intuitive game in many repects.

[jakethebake]

[ QUOTE ]
Bruce lee could beat sklansky.

[/ QUOTE ]
But could he beat a tiger?

[SomethingClever]

[ QUOTE ]
Poker is not a very intuitive game in many repects.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but neither is the theory of Relativity...

[Lazymeatball]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Poker is not a very intuitive game in many repects.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, but neither is the theory of Relativity...

[/ QUOTE ]

Now i dare you to provide some correlation between the two.

[jakethebake]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Poker is not a very intuitive game in many repects.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, but neither is the theory of Relativity...

[/ QUOTE ]
Now i dare you to provide some correlation between the two.

[/ QUOTE ]
I don't understand either one well enough. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[daryn]

einstein would get crushed vs. almost anyone on this site. well, not the idiots. you know what i mean.

poker's not his game. he would get checkraised on the turn, and all he would be thinking of is how to unify gravity with the quantum forces.

[Patrick del Poker Grande]

Don't you guys remember when Mike McD walked into the judges' game? I would own Einstein. Bring it, Al!

[FatMan]

Why not add Stephen Hawking, Sir Isaac Newton and Data. They can all play on the Holodeck.

[MS Sunshine]

"Van Gogh"

I think this one might have tilt issues.

MS Sunshine