#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
What card did the lovely river bring?
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
What card did the lovely river bring? [/ QUOTE ] does it matter? A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
when I start playing those games, I hope I run as good as you.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
Jesus, you're sick.
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
just how good can one man run
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
can you show the math please? [/ QUOTE ] sure. pot odds are 5600:16400 = 2.93 that translates to a necessary winning chance of 25.45% if we assume 10 outs (and 44 unseen cards) if he is behind, he wins 10/44 = 22,72%. if we assume 31 'outs' if he is ahead, he wins 31/44 = 70.45%. if p is the chance that you are bluffing, his winning chance is p * 70.45 + (1-p) * 22.72 this term must be greater than 25,45 therefore the break even point is p * 70.45 + (1-p) * 22.72 = 25,45 <==> p * 47.72 = 2.72 <==> p = 0.0571 = 5.71% the break even point obviously depends on how many outs villain has on average (especially when he is behind) but with the variables i have calculated, this is a clear call imo. *edit* the slightly different value compared to my first post is is due to a different number of outs that i have assumed if he is ahead (in this calculation it is a little bit higher) and more exact calculation |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
The truth is that nobody ever checkraises with a draw and folds it on the same street. Never. [/ QUOTE ] yea... hu kane id check the turn, call some rivers with just 4s and raise/put in nice value bet if i do hit. that would be standard tho, no? also - and I have a feeling you wont answer this - why minraise this hand pf? very interesting to me. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
I never considered he backdoored a flush draw because his raise doesnt leave enough money behind in his stack for me to be afriad of the river, basically he is making it push or fold for me which doesnt make much sense with a draw. [/ QUOTE ] Thats why he plays limit! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
also - and I have a feeling you wont answer this - why minraise this hand pf? very interesting to me. [/ QUOTE ] just too be more random. let him call here with J7s. |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50/100 NL hand vs Far
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] also - and I have a feeling you wont answer this - why minraise this hand pf? very interesting to me. [/ QUOTE ] just too be more random. let him call here with J7s. [/ QUOTE ] ahh ok. not as complicated as ithought it would be [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
|
|