Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 08-25-2005, 01:55 PM
gomberg gomberg is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago
Posts: 22
Default Re: Commerce 20/40 NL Hand

Check-raising big on the turn is a good idea. Didn't even think of that - love this forum [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:13 PM
Ulysses Ulysses is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,519
Default Re: Commerce 20/40 NL Hand

I would checkraise the turn to somewhere between 1500 and 2000.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:13 PM
FoxwoodsFiend FoxwoodsFiend is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Haven
Posts: 248
Default Re: Commerce 20/40 NL Hand

I said above that I thought villain was going broke either way. That was 3:00 a.m. I think the important point is that IF villain is capable of laying down the K [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] then he's going to need just as many bets to confirm he's behind regardless of whether you check-raise or lead the turn.
Scenario 1: You check-raise, he calls. You lead river, he raises (probably), you reraise he folds. 4 bets are made.
Scenario 2: You lead turn. Villain raises you reraise, he calls. You lead river, he (almost certainly) just calls. 4 bets are made.
I think the only real difference between the size of the bets is whether you will bet more leading out on the turn than villain would if you checked, but that's hard to tell.
So I guess my point is if villain's capable of going broke here, he'll go broke regardless of what you do. If he's capable of laying this down, roughly the same amount of money is going in before he's certain he beats.
Still, it's possible I'm wrong. If I am, it would be in how I describe the river action in scenario 2. If villain is raising the river despite the 3-bet on the turn, you get a chance to bust him. I would say that this is more likely than him raising the river in scenario 1 (which he did) AND calling your final raise. Since you would need both of these things in scenario 1 to happen to get in that 5th bet whereas you need the more likely scenario of him putting in a raise on the river in scenario 2 to get the fifth bet there, leading the turn and 3-betting is still better.
I know this is all guesswork...does anybody disagree with my assumptions of which scenario is more likely to get villain to go broke?
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 08-25-2005, 02:24 PM
kagame kagame is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lawrence, ks
Posts: 300
Default Re: Commerce 20/40 NL Hand

do we really think theres no difference between check raising and leading here?

somewhat incredible if true

the best line is possibly totally dependent upon your read of villains read of your betting pattern, wow
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 08-25-2005, 03:28 PM
mgsimpleton mgsimpleton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: Commerce 20/40 NL Hand

hey what do you guys think of big turn lead (followed up by calling the inevitable big raise) then open pushing all in on the river? any chance this can be a set "praying he doesn't have the K"?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.