#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obligatory 18,692 hand Stat Post. Leaks?
[ QUOTE ]
As far as my WtSD goes, it seems to me that whenever I make a questionable fold and someone else calls the raiser down, 9 times out of 10 they tend to show exactly what I suspected they had. On the flip side, I have been taken off a couple pretty beastly pots by people playing nothing at all. I can't help but feel that it's saved me some $ overall though. [/ QUOTE ] If 1 time out of 10 they've got nothing, and you're getting at least 9-to-1 odds from the pot, you should call down rather than fold. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obligatory 18,692 hand Stat Post. Leaks?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] As far as my WtSD goes, it seems to me that whenever I make a questionable fold and someone else calls the raiser down, 9 times out of 10 they tend to show exactly what I suspected they had. On the flip side, I have been taken off a couple pretty beastly pots by people playing nothing at all. I can't help but feel that it's saved me some $ overall though. [/ QUOTE ] If 1 time out of 10 they've got nothing, and you're getting at least 9-to-1 odds from the pot, you should call down rather than fold. [/ QUOTE ] Unfortunate it's not often that you can call down from the flop on and get more than 9:1 on your calls. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obligatory 18,692 hand Stat Post. Leaks?
I hate to be results oriented, but you are beating .5/1 for 3BB/100 over a pretty large sample size. It's obvious that your style of play works for you. Why would you want to change what you are doing just to fit the twoplustwo ideal stat prototype? If I were you, I'd move to 1/2 and see how you do there. It looks like it is about time to move up.
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Obligatory 18,692 hand Stat Post. Leaks?
To be honest, I feel like my actual winrate probably runs anywhere from 2 - 3.5BB/100. Swinging almost .5BB/100 in any given day is not at all rare. It makes me wonder how well I am actually beating the game.
I guess what I'm really saying is that I want a winrate like Droolie's... [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
|
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
Can you provide a link to that program?
It's pretty impressive that you kept chugging away even after you were down 200 BB. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
[ QUOTE ]
Can you provide a link to that program? It's pretty impressive that you kept chugging away even after you were down 200 BB. [/ QUOTE ] www.pokergrapher.com It's built by a 2+2er. |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
[ QUOTE ]
Can you provide a link to that program? It's pretty impressive that you kept chugging away even after you were down 200 BB. [/ QUOTE ] Took some breaks while I was down, went back down to 1/2 for a little bit. The BBJ 2/4 tables helped as well! |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
that graph is insane, thats some crazy swings man, I would be pulling my hair out. Nice to see that it eventually goes up again. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]
|
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Sometimes it takes many hands to truly know...
[ QUOTE ]
that graph is insane, thats some crazy swings man, I would be pulling my hair out. Nice to see that it eventually goes up again. [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] You're telling me [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
|
|