ATTN: Richie Rich Haters

[fimbulwinter]

what's with the new, nicer, more informative KKF?

inquiring minds want to know.

fim

[Richie Rich]

[ QUOTE ]
I think you're missing the point. people are not hating on you here, they're just blown away at the fact that you offer simplistic advice in complex situations and then, to your own detriment, insist that things are as such even when faced with overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

[/ QUOTE ]
Example?

[Richie Rich]

[ QUOTE ]
create a new I.D., continue to post, see if you still get called out, if so, then its pausible that their attacks arent personal.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would if I cared enough.

[Voltron87]

all the twodimes stuff you posted. AA vs 87, 88, etc.

[Richie Rich]

Please explain.

[BobboFitos]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
create a new I.D., continue to post, see if you still get called out, if so, then its pausible that their attacks arent personal.

[/ QUOTE ]
I would if I cared enough.

[/ QUOTE ]

I dont really like associating myself with this type of flame war online, as it's fairly stupid to get that emotional about an ONLINE ARGUMENT, but -

Richie, the fact that you keep posting "why?" and various links and responding to everyone involved clearly shows you do, in fact, care. KKF's advice is solid in that regaurd - if you truly feel el diablo / et al are attacking YOU, make a new name, and in a month show what a horrible person he is. Or, and what I think will happen, show that he's not horrible whatsoever and really just a knowledgeable poker player.

BTW, Im not a "richie hater," and I doubt any of these posters are, as well. Annoyed? Maybe. Hateful? No.

Good day!

[Voltron87]

justifying calling a raise with 87 because if the opponent has AA you are 20% to win and have "implied odds". you were wrong about that, or at least wrong when you just posted the stats only.

[Richie Rich]

BobboFitos- thanks for your message. I hear what you're saying, but I can assure you that this is not getting emotional. Semi-interesting, maybe.

Glad to hear you're not a "richie hater". Perhaps the people's "annoyance" stems from me and Diablo disagreeing in a couple of posts. And despite his condescending/witty/patronizing tone, Diablo is still the people's favorite.

[Richie Rich]

I only posted twodimes numbers for the sake of simplicity. Obviously the people who read the Mid-, High-Stakes forum are smarter than that. I apologize. I went on further to mention a number of relevant factors in regard to calling a pf raise with a non-dominated hand (like AJ or KQ), including but not limited to: (a) table image, (b) deeper stacks, (c) mixing up play, (& d) implied odds relative to blinds. Hope that clears things up.

[pzhon]

[ QUOTE ]
Many have said that I'm giving horrible advice in this forum. A majority of these people also happen to be the same persons with whom I have shared some sort of disagreement with in a written post. Coincidence? I think not.

[/ QUOTE ]
Many people thought you were giving horrible advice, but only some of those were motivated enough to post that thought.

[ QUOTE ]
I ask for sound reasoning and explanation as to why you think I am so far off the mark. I have yet to hear anything beyond "you suck at poker", "your logic is horrible", or "more respected posters are shooting through your argument". My aim is not to create more enemies, just understand the logic behind your reasoning.

[/ QUOTE ]
If you have yet to hear anything more than venom, it is your own fault. In those threads, there were posts that highlighted particular wrong ideas of yours and explained why they were wrong. You did not respond to those posts, and perhaps you didn't bother reading them.

Here is one example.

Your suggestion that there has been no constructive criticism, only abuse, is ridiculous.