|
|
#31
03-24-2004, 03:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
are we going to try to do a "tourney of Champions"?
Top 5 from each board in one SnG ? And how if I may ask is that going to happen, considering I will be in first place at both leaderboards? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Kind of like the Idea of having an European in top of the N.american leaderboard, he, he. The vikings are invading the new world again [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] William [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] 
|
|
#32
03-24-2004, 03:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
[ QUOTE ]
And how if I may ask is that going to happen, considering I will be in first place at both leaderboards? Kind of like the Idea of having an European in top of the N.american leaderboard, he, he. The vikings are invading the new world again [/ QUOTE ] Nobody messed with the U.S. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] Bring it on William. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] This could be a sweet idea, I think if the top 4 from both play, and then the two number 5's play a HU match to see who gets the 9th seed. just a though...
|
|
#33
03-24-2004, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
Erm, silly suggestion maybe - but how about top 9 from each in a two table SNG?
All hypothetical of course. Simon
|
|
#34
03-24-2004, 05:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
how about top 9 from each in a two table SNG?
As we cannot control who enters the SNG, how about 7 from each board, to make sure everybody gets a seat? We can just ignore the non 2+2 players. William
|
|
#35
03-24-2004, 06:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
you guys are in charge of this.
sounds good to me.
|
|
#36
03-24-2004, 06:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
I would seek to host something like this as a private event. I know Stars have ruled it out at the moment, but there may be other options.
Let the leaderboard kick into life first anyhow and see how that pans out. Simon
|
|
#37
03-24-2004, 08:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2 SnG Results
[ QUOTE ]
Let the leaderboard kick into life first anyhow and see how that pans out. [/ QUOTE ] Good idea [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#38
03-24-2004, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Two tourneys for eligibility
13-1 when I posted this. That's a pretty good majority of votes with which to make a decision.
So, in our second week and beyond, you will have had to play in at least two tourneys to appear on the leaderboard standings. If you have played in one, and don't see yourself - Remember, your points are not wasted and I am keeping track of them all, but you will have to play a second tourney for them to count. If you only plan on playing one tourney every ten weeks for some reason, please don't be discouraged about not being a part of the leaderboard. I will probably find some way to incorporate top finishers into other stats or a weekly winners list. Regards, Brad S
|
|
#39
03-24-2004, 08:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Two tourneys for eligibility
Good call. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Simon
|
|
#40
03-24-2004, 09:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Other results
I wish to offer congratulations to US! Tim Perkin, Stoneii, VinnyTheFish, Simon, AleoMagus, and ME!!!!!
We wanted to stimulate interest in the SNG series. We wanted more hand analysis. We wanted more enthusiasm. We got it!!!!!!!! We also want more players. To those who have watched, read, thought about jumping in to play... The SNG games are FUN. They are also a way to learn poker from some of the BEST! Getting beat by William, (MobyDick), HelmetSky, heyrocker, Poker Jon, or Byron is a PRIVILEDGE! Because I learn something new every time they do it to me! Jump in. You will be glad you did. Doc
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
