Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:37 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: AKs.

As the tension mounds, I thought I'd say these discussions are what makes poker fun and interesting...there's always lots to think about and different ways for hands to be played [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:38 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
I find it interesting that all the reasons you give for NOT raising the flop would seem to dictate NOT betting the turn, which you did for some reason. Especially considering that a hand like KJ is a 10:1 dog now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm really not sure how you aren't getting this yet. To be brief, I bet the turn because our opponent checked and signaled weakness. With a hand such as KJo or something, yes, he's a pretty big dog. But giving a free card is giving him a free shot at cracking my hand, a definite no no. On the flop it was different, he lead into a big field and a PFR, his hand strength was unknown to me, but I still had TPTK. Folding there is too weak, raising is too aggro.

Like I said, I think it's better to call the flop and evaluate the turn. I did that and he check-minraised me. I think he has AQ or 99. If he had AQ, my call on the flop was alright given the circumstances, he was an 11:1 dog, no huge harm in not raising there. If he had 99, excellent, I didn't raise a hand that had me crushed. I have position, I decided to slow down on the flop and utilize it on the turn.


[ QUOTE ]
Like I said, I would expect that the bet is intended to freeze me up when he has a hand like QJ and doesn't want to call a big bet. Notice that you are neither way ahead of nor way behind QJ.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, but again, I do not see QJ leading here. He should expect to get raised by me, not only called. A 6xBB preflop raiser should have a very strong hand, especially on this board. I would say QJo would check-call. Again, just matters of opinion.

Anyways, I obviously folded. I'm reasonably sure he had 99.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:39 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.

Also this pot isn't even heads up. You are letting people in behind you getting like 7 to 1 with cheese hands like T9.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:40 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I find it interesting that all the reasons you give for NOT raising the flop would seem to dictate NOT betting the turn, which you did for some reason. Especially considering that a hand like KJ is a 10:1 dog now.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm really not sure how you aren't getting this yet. To be brief, I bet the turn because our opponent checked and signaled weakness. With a hand such as KJo or something, yes, he's a pretty big dog. But giving a free card is giving him a free shot at cracking my hand, a definite no no. On the flop it was different, he lead into a big field and a PFR, his hand strength was unknown to me, but I still had TPTK. Folding there is too weak, raising is too aggro.

Like I said, I think it's better to call the flop and evaluate the turn. I did that and he check-minraised me. I think he has AQ or 99. If he had AQ, my call on the flop was alright given the circumstances, he was an 11:1 dog, no huge harm in not raising there. If he had 99, excellent, I didn't raise a hand that had me crushed. I have position, I decided to slow down on the flop and utilize it on the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

A free shot at cracking your hand? Are you afraid he'll river a set of deuces?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:42 PM
-Skeme- -Skeme- is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: S. Korea ($100 NL)
Posts: 2,694
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
A free shot at cracking your hand? Are you afraid he'll river a set of deuces?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't even know what the [censored] this means. All I was saying is that giving a free card in this spot is ALWAYS wrong. He has checked and told me I have the best hand. Checking here gives him infinite odds. Even if he's a 8:1 dog, giving a free card when he's TELLING ME he is weak is wrong. I have to charge him something.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:45 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.

Only when the chance of getting check-raised is 0.0%.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:46 PM
amoeba amoeba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 691
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A free shot at cracking your hand? Are you afraid he'll river a set of deuces?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't even know what the [censored] this means. All I was saying is that giving a free card in this spot is ALWAYS wrong. He has checked and told me I have the best hand. Checking here gives him infinite odds. Even if he's a 8:1 dog, giving a free card when he's TELLING ME he is weak is wrong. I have to charge him something.

[/ QUOTE ]

then why aren't you raising the flop?

I think the difference in actions between the flop and the turn is no good.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:47 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A free shot at cracking your hand? Are you afraid he'll river a set of deuces?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't even know what the [censored] this means. All I was saying is that giving a free card in this spot is ALWAYS wrong. He has checked and told me I have the best hand. Checking here gives him infinite odds. Even if he's a 8:1 dog, giving a free card when he's TELLING ME he is weak is wrong. I have to charge him something.

[/ QUOTE ]

then why aren't you raising the flop?

I think the difference in actions between the flop and the turn is no good.

[/ QUOTE ]

Which is exactly my point. He's so worried about playing a medium sized pot in a marginal situation, so he just calls. Then one of the WORST cards hits, and now all of the sudden he wants to "protect" his hand.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:50 PM
Mercman572 Mercman572 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 261
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I lose less when behind when I just raise the flop. If the guys comes over the top for all his chips I fold. If he calls, I'm checking the turn and then probably folding to any reasonable river value bet. I don't want to get into the spot that you're in where I'm calling half-pot, half-pot, half-pot all the way down.


[/ QUOTE ]
I don't like this. I feel you win alot less by folding out his worse hands. By checking the turn you are inducing a river bet from worse hands, but assume only a better hand stayed from your flop reraise and fold to a river bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

So basically if everyone checks we should be checking the flop behind? Right? I mean we are only inducing worse hands to fold. That's bad right?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Lets not be stupid here. A 1/3 I probably PSR, is it right to do? Maybe. Think about it. A 1/3 bet is either a weak holding or lock hand (QJ, K10, KJ or KQ in most cases). Thus it's a WA/WB situation, as opposed to being checked to where we are ahead most times and either want a call when we bet or a fold, as its unlikely to have a free card make an opponent a second best hand. We are probably ahead most times, but a reraise folds out worse hands, whereas calling and checking the turn induces a raise or call on the river when you are best.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 11-13-2005, 04:52 PM
scdavis0 scdavis0 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4
Default Re: AKs.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I lose less when behind when I just raise the flop. If the guys comes over the top for all his chips I fold. If he calls, I'm checking the turn and then probably folding to any reasonable river value bet. I don't want to get into the spot that you're in where I'm calling half-pot, half-pot, half-pot all the way down.


[/ QUOTE ]
I don't like this. I feel you win alot less by folding out his worse hands. By checking the turn you are inducing a river bet from worse hands, but assume only a better hand stayed from your flop reraise and fold to a river bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

So basically if everyone checks we should be checking the flop behind? Right? I mean we are only inducing worse hands to fold. That's bad right?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Lets not be stupid here. A 1/3 I probably PSR, is it right to do? Maybe. Think about it. A 1/3 bet is either a weak holding or lock hand (QJ, K10, KJ or KQ in most cases). Thus it's a WA/WB situation, as opposed to being checked to where we are ahead most times and either want a call when we bet or a fold, as its unlikely to have a free card make an opponent a second best hand. We are probably ahead most times, but a reraise folds out worse hands, whereas calling and checking the turn induces a raise or call on the river when you are best. Please use applicable explanations rather than invalid exagerations, it's for the benefit of everyone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Are we way ahead of QJ?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.