#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
I think you should spend more time posting about and thinking about more marginal situations, rather than whether or not you got the most money out of your monster hand.
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
I've read every word, and anyone who advocates short stacking is wrong and can just like it. If I flop AAK with AA and get all in on the turn, I may as well make icicles in my freezer so I can jam them in my eyes. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. BUT, Since I was outdrawn on this hand I was glad I was shortstacked. Hows that for results oriented thinking? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
A set on the flop (even bottom set) is monsterish - [/ QUOTE ] come on bro, bottomset is always a monster, well except in plo where its trash |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
Hi Walkamongus i really think you need to bet and raise every chance you get. Either someone has an ace or a flush draw or they are folding. Slowplaying any street is just costing you money and i don't even think its very close. I think anyone that is calling one bet here is calling two(flop and turn).
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
The chance that somebody will pay you off significantly on every street with a strong Ace is enough to deter you from slowplaying. Just raise the flop and hope somebody has A10.
|
|
|